Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: highball

In post 217 of this thread you said the 10th amendment. Now you are saying you are talking about the 9th amendment They may fall for that at DU but not here.

Now as far as The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

it was the people who made the law by voting for representatives who would pass that law so the people in doing so had retained their right to have a law. Just because some Judge didn't like the law did not make the law unconstitutional any more than the Roe v. Wade decision was based on constitutional grounds. \

Only a Liberal belives this type of shit. Liberals hang out on DU. Go back to DU.


245 posted on 10/25/2005 9:57:30 AM PDT by Khepera (Do not remove by penalty of law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies ]


To: Khepera
In post 217 of this thread you said the 10th amendment. Now you are saying you are talking about the 9th amendment They may fall for that at DU but not here.

And in 222, I discussed the Ninth. If you are having trouble following a conversation, I would suggest actually reading the posts in a thread.

246 posted on 10/25/2005 10:37:17 AM PDT by highball ("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson