[highball]

In post 217 of this thread you said the 10th amendment. Now you are saying you are talking about the 9th amendment They may fall for that at DU but not here.

And in 222, I discussed the Ninth. If you are having trouble following a conversation, I would suggest actually reading the posts in a thread.

[DirtyHarryY2K]

I would suggest actually reading the posts in a thread.

Perversion (sodomarriage) is not a civil right.

My effort is to stand up for decency, morality and ethical standards, and I do so simply by providing the reality of truth, ethics and the morals which founded this country.

If you are adverse to these morals, I recommend you move to a more "liberal" locale, such as Canada, France, Netherlands, Norway, Spain or Sweden. I'm told that their Socialistic permissive governments are quite willing to tolerate the various psychosis inherent in both sexual psychotics and the lower forms of life which grant them credence.

[Khepera]

Now you are making me responsible for knowing about a conversation you are having with someone else?

Well OK then but as the other person you were responding to was implying, YOU are grossly misinterpreting the constitution. You need to quit reading between the lines and sniffing out penumbras and other rare gases.

I suggest you quit interpreting and just read what it plainly says.