Skip to comments.
20 Arrested, 171 Vehicles Impounded At Checkpoint
AP ^
| 10-24-05
| (AP) POMONA, Calif
Posted on 10/24/2005 9:22:30 AM PDT by VRing
AP) POMONA, Calif. Pomona police arrested 20 people, impounded 171 vehicles and issued 194 citations during a sobriety and license check operation that wrapped up early this morning.
(Excerpt) Read more at cbs2.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; jbt; leo; papersplease; papierenbitte
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-136 next last
To: VRing
Pomona running short of money?
21
posted on
10/24/2005 9:48:53 AM PDT
by
Ford4000
To: Ford4000
"Pomona running short of money?"
Doesn't look like they collected much with this little adventure.
22
posted on
10/24/2005 9:50:59 AM PDT
by
VRing
To: VRing
23
posted on
10/24/2005 9:52:10 AM PDT
by
freeeee
("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord.)
To: freeeee
How many of these do you have???
24
posted on
10/24/2005 9:57:34 AM PDT
by
VRing
To: VRing
They're all from google. I won't post any more. I've made my point and I don't want to hog bandwidth/slow page loading.
25
posted on
10/24/2005 9:59:08 AM PDT
by
freeeee
("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord.)
To: freeeee
thanks for the pics keep them comming if you have them
26
posted on
10/24/2005 9:59:08 AM PDT
by
vrwc0915
(I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against al)
To: vrwc0915; All
Where are the JBT boot licker cheerleaders? We need to be told how these checkpoints are for our own good
27
posted on
10/24/2005 10:01:06 AM PDT
by
vrwc0915
(I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against al)
Comment #28 Removed by Moderator
To: vrwc0915
Where are the JBT boot licker cheerleaders? Maybe they're being detained without probable cause at roadblocks?
29
posted on
10/24/2005 10:04:28 AM PDT
by
freeeee
("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord.)
To: VRing
Yea, a .2% success rate is something to be proud of. - wow that is low; we must be a country of law abiding citizens, I would have thought much higher.
To: VRing
Great results and I approve of such things as long as they are done at times when people are NOT going to work.
31
posted on
10/24/2005 10:17:34 AM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: VRing
"Pomona running short of money?" Doesn't look like they collected much with this little adventure. New twist on a speed trap.....both are designed to enrich the city's wallet (as does letting illegals work for chump change).
32
posted on
10/24/2005 10:19:40 AM PDT
by
add925
(The Left = Xenophobes in Denial)
To: freeeee
Politicians in California want a Soviet Union with sunshine..
33
posted on
10/24/2005 10:21:22 AM PDT
by
sheik yerbouty
( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
To: sheik yerbouty
Politicians in California want a Soviet Union with sunshine.
34
posted on
10/24/2005 10:26:12 AM PDT
by
freeeee
("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord.)
To: freeeee
35
posted on
10/24/2005 10:29:36 AM PDT
by
sheik yerbouty
( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
To: spokeshave
36
posted on
10/24/2005 10:31:11 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Those who know don't talk, those who talk don't know.)
To: VRing
They impounded 171 vehicles; I wonder why?
37
posted on
10/24/2005 10:42:16 AM PDT
by
Old Professer
(Fix the problem, not the blame!)
To: VRing
Wow. What a gold mine for the City of Pomona. Impounds cost the accused 25 to 75 dollars per day for storage, plus tow charges, plus administrative fees paid to the city, plus satisfying the fine or other charges. There is usually a city-favored tow company involved, which gets to keep a lot of the money.
This can be prohibitive for some people if it sits in the impound lot for more than a couple of days. Much of the time the people who lose their cars this way are druggies and nobody gets upset when druggies lose their cars. Those that keep their cars after such an event probably end up incurring a major hit on the old bank account. Unclaimed cars are auctioned off, with the proceeds going to satisfy the myriad charges, and supposedly the balance refunded to the erstwhile owner(s). It doesn't matter if the person driving when stopped is the owner of the car or not. The owner will pay at least the towing cost and storage charges and administrative fees.
I believe this is the same as depriving one of property without due process. The cash that you pay to get your car back is property, and the excessive costs are deprivation, and the fact that they can do that by setting up a checkpoint is without due process. It sucks.
38
posted on
10/24/2005 11:04:16 AM PDT
by
webheart
(Pajamarazzi Rules!)
To: A CA Guy
Do you mind warantless searches of peoples homes as long as it is not dinner time as well
39
posted on
10/24/2005 11:55:38 AM PDT
by
vrwc0915
(I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against al)
To: VRing
In the Kansas City area a few years ago we had the police set up some sobriety checkpoints on the main feeder roads just off the main interstate loop that serves Arrowhead Stadium. It just happened to coincide with the end of a Chief's game. LOL...you want to talk about a traffic jam.
40
posted on
10/24/2005 12:00:28 PM PDT
by
KC Burke
(Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-136 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson