To: Sabramerican
Forbes would have made the better President.In my view, anyone in that goup of primary candidates would have been a better president...Apparently the media convinced the people to vote for Bush because he was winnable...
10 posted on
10/24/2005 9:48:54 AM PDT by
Iscool
(Your choice...The Party, or the Republic...)
To: Iscool
In my view, anyone in that goup of primary candidates would have been a better president...Apparently the media convinced the people to vote for Bush because he was winnable... So that was it! The MSM convinced us to take Dubya. Who wudda thunk it?
If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.
11 posted on
10/24/2005 9:59:30 AM PDT by
rdb3
(Have you ever stopped to think, but forgot to start again?)
To: Iscool
In my view, anyone in that goup of primary candidates would have been a better president...Apparently the media convinced the people to vote for Bush because he was winnable... Yeah. We're too stupid to decide on our own, like you are, so we need the media to tell us who to vote for.
If you actually believe that Gary Bauer or Alan Keyes wouldn't have been laughingstocks in the first two months of their presidencies, I have a bridge to sell you.
16 posted on
10/24/2005 11:03:12 AM PDT by
sinkspur
(If you're not willing to give Harriett Miers a hearing, I don't give a damn what you think.)
To: Iscool
In my view, anyone in that goup of primary candidates would have been a better president...Apparently the media convinced the people to vote for Bush because he was winnable...
I agree. Bush was close to my last choice of the GOP primary candidates (McPain was dead last). That said, he was still worlds better than Bradley or Gore.
It is necessary for conservatives to line up early with both votes and financial resources behind ONE candidate.
20 posted on
10/24/2005 11:21:46 AM PDT by
Antoninus
(The greatest gifts parents can give their children are siblings.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson