Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Bushies Feeling the Boss' wrath"
nydailynews.com ^ | THOMAS M. DeFRANK

Posted on 10/24/2005 6:09:15 AM PDT by tartnjuicy

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/358714p-305660c.html Prez's anger growing in hard times - pals

BY THOMAS M. DeFRANK DAILY NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU CHIEF

President Bush is facing specter of losing irreplaceable aide Karl Rove.

WASHINGTON - Facing the darkest days of his presidency, President Bush is frustrated, sometimes angry and even bitter, his associates say. With a seemingly uncontrollable insurgency in Iraq, the White House is bracing for the political fallout from a grim milestone that could come any day: the combat death of the 2,000th American G.I.

Last week alone, 23 military personnel were killed in Iraq, and five were wounded yesterday in a relentless series of attacks across the country.

This week could also bring a special prosecutor's decision that could shake the foundations of the Bush government.

The President's top political guru, Karl Rove, and Vice President Cheney's right-hand man, Lewis (Scooter) Libby, are at the center of a two-year criminal probe into the leak of a CIA agent's identity. Many Bush staffers believe indictments are likely.

"He's like the lion in winter," observed a political friend of Bush. "He's frustrated. He remains quite confident in the decisions he has made. But this is a guy who wanted to do big things in a second term. Given his nature, there's no way he'd be happy about the way things have gone."

Bush usually reserves his celebrated temper for senior aides because he knows they can take it. Lately, however, some junior staffers have also faced the boss' wrath.

"This is not some manager at McDonald's chewing out the help," said a source with close ties to the White House when told about these outbursts. "This is the President of the United States, and it's not a pleasant sight."

The specter of losing Rove, his only truly irreplaceable assistant, lies at the heart of Bush's distress. But a string of political reversals, including growing opposition to the Iraq war, Hurricane Katrina's aftermath and Harriet Miers' bungled Supreme Court nomination, have also exacted a personal toll.

Presidential advisers and friends say Bush is a mass of contradictions: cheerful and serene, peevish and melancholy, occasionally lapsing into what he once derided as the "blame game." They describe him as beset but unbowed, convinced that history will vindicate the major decisions of his presidency even if they damage him and his party in the 2006 and 2008 elections.

At the same time, these sources say Bush, who has a long history of keeping staffers in their place, has lashed out at aides as his political woes have mounted.

"The President is just unhappy in general and casting blame all about," said one Bush insider. "Andy [Card, the chief of staff] gets his share. Karl gets his share. Even Cheney gets his share. And the press gets a big share."

The vice president remains Bush's most trusted political confidant. Even so, the Daily News has learned Bush has told associates Cheney was overly involved in intelligence issues in the runup to the Iraq war that have been seized on by Bush critics.

Bush is so dismayed that "the only person escaping blame is the President himself," said a sympathetic official, who delicately termed such self-exoneration "illogical."

A second senior Bush loyalist disagreed, saying Bush knows "some of these things are self-inflicted," like the Miers nomination, where Bush jettisoned contrary advice from his advisers and appointed his longtime personal lawyer.

"He must know that the way he did that, relying on his own judgment and instinct, was not good," another key adviser said.

Despite the turmoil, Bush is determined to soldier on, already preparing for two major overseas trips in November and helping shape next year's legislative agenda.

"I've got a job to do," he told reporters last week. "The American people expect me to do my job, and I'm going to."

Originally published on October 24, 2005


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antiamerica; bushhatred; cia; leak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: tartnjuicy
But a string of political reversals, including growing opposition to the Iraq war, Hurricane Katrina's aftermath and Harriet Miers' bungled Supreme Court nomination, have also exacted a personal toll.

Iraq's doing fine - and the ghouls who want to celebrate death will dishonor themselves, not Bush. Katrina is the fault of dems in NO, not the Bush Administration, and when Harriet steps aside and someone Republicans can love is put up, it'll be all sunshine.

21 posted on 10/24/2005 6:24:39 AM PDT by GOPJ (Protest a dem -- light your hair on fire -- and the MSM still won't take your picture.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fenris6

Michael Yon is indeed a REAL journalist. I love his work, and read it daily for updates.


22 posted on 10/24/2005 6:24:58 AM PDT by tartnjuicy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tartnjuicy

What crap! "losing irreplaceable aide"... junior high school journalism from very replaceable news sources.

Enough with these obvious hit pieces against our President and our country.


23 posted on 10/24/2005 6:26:23 AM PDT by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

I can't imagine that the president is a happy man these days. Rove is extremely important to him. And wonders of all wonders, the president is a normal human being. He has moods, gets angry and blames other people. He's going through a period of adjustant of his "new normal" (assuming that Rove and Libby are indicted). He's got Laura and as he says "she's no shrinking violet." She'll help him during this painful transition and he'll be fine. He could even come back stronger. God has used this wise and strong man to guide our country thus far. He'll will continue to hold him in the palm of His hand.


24 posted on 10/24/2005 6:27:42 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tartnjuicy
what did that article say...????

it basically said.... nothing.. no examples, no quotes, gee I guess Bush is just sitting at his desk late at night, rubbing his temples, crying and saying to the ghost of Richard Nixon, " what have I done? What can possibly save me? What will my legacy be....??? I really, really, really care what the Washington Post and the New York Daily and the New York Times say when I'm gone."

I just hope we get another guy in that is "an idiot", "born again Christian", "conservative" , and has a "failed legacy".... As I've always said..."Liberals suck"......unless they blow of course...

25 posted on 10/24/2005 6:27:48 AM PDT by Dick Vomer (liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tartnjuicy
If he keeps faith, the President can handle any challenge he is given. The President knows this and it is a reservoir of strength.
26 posted on 10/24/2005 6:28:02 AM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paraclete

Good Observation.

Of course, I say that because it is exactly what I've been thinking. Similar in so many ways.


27 posted on 10/24/2005 6:29:36 AM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Vision
They are actually professionals who consider themselves the best at what they do / rolling eyes

Yeah, but the question is "professional" what?

28 posted on 10/24/2005 6:30:27 AM PDT by McGavin999 (We're a First World Country with a Third World Press (Except for Hume & Garrett ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: clee1

I count at LEAST 11 "impeccable sources"
Impeccable source #1: his associates say
Impeccable source #2: a political friend of Bush
Impeccable source #3: some junior staffers
Impeccable source #4: said a source with close ties
Impeccable source #5: Presidential advisers and friends
Impeccable source #6: sources say
Impeccable source #7: one Bush insider
Impeccable source #8: associates
Impeccable source #9: a sympathetic official
Impeccable source #10: senior Bush loyalist
Impeccable source #11: another key adviser


29 posted on 10/24/2005 6:32:51 AM PDT by tartnjuicy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cynicom

He probably shouldn't have burned his base...


30 posted on 10/24/2005 6:34:17 AM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

While the press was looking the other way, a war was contuiing in Iraq, . I may be totally wrong in this, but the new Iraqi security force is being brought up to speed a lot faster than were thelocal forces in Korea and Vietnam.


31 posted on 10/24/2005 6:44:17 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: twigs
From The American Spectator blog...

A Prediction - Sunday, October 23, 2005...

Official Washington buzzes with the prediction Karl Rove will be indicted this week. Now is a good time to buck the buzz and predict he will not.

Just from reading the verbose news reports one can gather that the chances of an indictment for Rove are minimal. For one, though the press reports that lawyers (unnamed) say he has been told he is in “serious” danger, this loose language is insufficient to conclude indictment is near.

I have yet to see it reported that Rove has been notified that he is a “target” of an investigation by the prosecutor, which according to the Justice Department guidelines is mandatory if he were in “serious” danger. Nor does it appear that he has even been notified that he falls into that far lesser category, namely, “subject” of an investigation. For another thing, the only problem with Rove’s grand jury testimony that we are aware of is that during one of his grand jury appearances he neglected to mention a meeting with a reporter. It is unlikely that this omission could constitute grounds for an indictment. Innocent failure to recall when not asked a specific question is not a crime. When Rove was asked specifically about the meeting he apparently acknowledged it.

Thus my guess is Rove goes free. Karl, take the week off and clean up your garage or head for the beach."

32 posted on 10/24/2005 6:44:42 AM PDT by veronica (What will "Ronnie" think? The question that obsesses the internut clowns...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tartnjuicy

Sounds like DeFrank spent 10 minutes with David Gergen.


33 posted on 10/24/2005 6:45:40 AM PDT by DCMB (Bless GWB and all our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB

He didn't burn his base. His base is with him. A lot of loudmouths who came along for the ride (Kristol and the bow tied sissies come to mind) are making a lot of noise, but his base is with him.


34 posted on 10/24/2005 6:46:44 AM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: syriacus; cynicom
All one has to do is watch Bushes face when he is on TV. He is indeed an enraged and bitter man.

The very picture of a modern day Nixon :-)

35 posted on 10/24/2005 6:47:46 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: veronica

I hope that you're right.

The other possibility is that FitzPatrick could uncover the CIA's role in opposing this president during wartime. Somewhere I read that Joe DiGenova thought that was a real possibility. I would like to think that, but I'm not very optimistic. Wouldn't that be a pleasant surprise? I don't know much about FitPatrick, so I don't know if he's capable of doing that or not.


36 posted on 10/24/2005 6:48:23 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
He is indeed an enraged and bitter man.

One day at a time.....This, too, shall pass.

37 posted on 10/24/2005 6:48:35 AM PDT by syriacus (Bush hasn't done a bad job, all things (WOT, vagaries of Nature, Lib lies + obstruction) considered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tartnjuicy
A second senior Bush loyalist disagreed, saying Bush knows "some of these things are self-inflicted," like the Miers nomination, where Bush jettisoned contrary advice from his advisers and appointed his longtime personal lawyer.

Since when is Bill Kristol a Bush loyalist???

38 posted on 10/24/2005 6:49:06 AM PDT by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tartnjuicy

Even if this were true, what does President Bush expect? He should be bitter and angry because he has chosen to play "moderate". He's getting hammered from both sides.


39 posted on 10/24/2005 6:52:19 AM PDT by manwiththehands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
The very picture of a modern day Nixon :-)

Thanks for pointing that out--I would have missed the "strong" similarity, because I never liked Nixon. (I was a lib during his Presidency).

I still like Bush...How can this be???? Maybe for the reasons stated in my tagline.

40 posted on 10/24/2005 6:54:39 AM PDT by syriacus (Bush hasn't done a bad job, all things (WOT, vagaries of Nature, Lib lies + obstruction) considered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson