Posted on 10/23/2005 9:46:40 PM PDT by lexfreedom
Frank Response (Frank Talk, October 2)
Bill Clinton was impeached for perjury, not his affair. He is a married man who had sex with a 25-year-old subordinate in the White House and lied about it. Anyone who tried to defend him is just as immoral, but since when did a representative whose apartment was used as a brothel have any morals? And what meaningful legislation has Barney Frank sponsored in his "illustrious" 25 year career? I must have been absent that day. I vaguely remember Charles P. Pierce as a reasonably competent sports writer. Perhaps he should return to a subject you know something about; it certainly isn't politics.
Steve Garfinkle /// Boston
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
How can the voters keep electing him?? (along with Kennedy, Kerry, and a long list of others ...)
Figure there must be something in the water or air in Mass.
Maybe they have a lot of dead people voting for the dems there too.
And the list seems to grow longer every day.
I have always figured that the overwhelming majority of the people of Massachusettes were vicious, obnoxious crooks. There has never been the slightest bit of evidence to contradict this theory.
If that horse's ass Ken "Red" Starr had done his job, and the pubs weren't worthless cowards, Clinton's scandals would have been properly remembered as treason, rather than just a fat slut.
The elites protect their own.
Because since he's Gay, it's OK that he SUCKS!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.