Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: okie01

"the gravity of the reported crime" and invoking "national security" suggests a far deeper and more serious affair is under investigation."

No, it doesn't. And as even Larry Zero Donnell confirmed, the judge doesn't think so either.

I don't know why everyone is so eager to go flying off the handle. This was about an alleged leak of an alleged covert CIA officer.

That's it. And it is SILLY to try to make it into something else.

Look at the list of those who appeared before the Grand Jury. Sheesh.


70 posted on 10/22/2005 9:37:40 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Sam Hill
That's it. And it is SILLY to try to make it into something else.

But "something else" was what churchillsbluff was trying to make of it.

My point was that, if the affair was so serious as the article implied, it would mean that the scope of the investigation had been expanded to stuff that was really serious -- well beyond a contrived perjury or obstruction charge.

Which, of course, would be an outcome that the original poster would not favor...

73 posted on 10/22/2005 9:48:26 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson