Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam Hill
That's it. And it is SILLY to try to make it into something else.

But "something else" was what churchillsbluff was trying to make of it.

My point was that, if the affair was so serious as the article implied, it would mean that the scope of the investigation had been expanded to stuff that was really serious -- well beyond a contrived perjury or obstruction charge.

Which, of course, would be an outcome that the original poster would not favor...

73 posted on 10/22/2005 9:48:26 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: okie01

"My point was that, if the affair was so serious as the article implied, it would mean that the scope of the investigation had been expanded to stuff that was really serious -- well beyond a contrived perjury or obstruction charge."

The seriousness is the IIAP law. This is from the February hearing deciding whether to put Miller and Cooper in jail for not cooperating with Fitzgerald.

I've seen nothing to indicate that Fitzgerald has ever been investigating anything else. And as even "Madman" Larry O'Donnell concedes, the judge says that's what this is about.

Don't let people like Churchillbuff (LOL) confuse you.


76 posted on 10/22/2005 9:54:24 PM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson