Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markedmannerf
I found some information that I'm not sure and would like anybody's take on it.
On Oct 20, the 911 Public Discourse Project held a press conference. The attendees were Tom Kean, Lee Hamilton, Slade Gordon, Tim Roemer, and Richard Ben Veniste, all of the 9-11 Commission. The title was Recommendations on Reforming Government Institutions. The members went through how different parts of the govt such as the Executive Branch, the Congress, the FBI, CIA and others are implementing 911 Commission recommendations.
At about 54 minutes into the press conference, a reporter asks Mr Kean if any of the members had read Louis Freeh's book and what they thought. Kean said he would read it if someone would give/loan him a copy. Then comes my point of this post. At 54:45 on the video, available on CSPAN website, Mr Hamilton comes out of the blue with (and I am paraphrasing) We spent a lot of time on Able Danger. We did not find a single bit of documentary evidence about Atta. He then said Slade had submitted a statement on Able Danger. I looked in both the 911 Report and the 911 Public Discourse Project website and found no such statement by Gordon. It seemed strange to me cause the conversation went from Freeh's book to Able Danger. It was like somebody asked what time it was and the answer was chocolate ice cream.
I dunno. First they never heard of Able Danger, then they spent a lotta time on it. No documents, boxes full of documents. I dunno.
Maybe the lovely and gracious Mrs Burf is right: I am loosing my marbles. I just thinks somebody is lying to me and a lot of other folks.
10 posted on 10/22/2005 6:23:46 PM PDT by Burf (We'll all be drinkin that free Bubble Up and eatin that Rainbow Stew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All
I hope this has not been previously posted. I did a check and did not come up with anything.
11 posted on 10/22/2005 6:27:25 PM PDT by Burf (We'll all be drinkin that free Bubble Up and eatin that Rainbow Stew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Burf
He then said Slade had submitted a statement on Able Danger.

The remark (smear) by Slade [i.e. there was nothing to Able Danger] was just plain propaganda.

23 posted on 10/23/2005 4:27:35 AM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Burf

On a related note, when Weldon was first breaking this story over the summer, Jamie Gorelick called him up out of the blue to defend herself and claim that she did nothing wrong.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1486678/posts


33 posted on 10/23/2005 4:46:44 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (You nonconformists are all the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Burf

I think Weldon did touch on some of what you said. He said the 9/11 Commission's story changed several times.

I'm not sure I saw that specific conference you mentioned; but it does sound familiar.


34 posted on 10/23/2005 4:47:09 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Burf

Do you have a link to that specific info?


36 posted on 10/23/2005 4:55:08 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (You nonconformists are all the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Burf
You are not losing any marbles. You are obviously a smart cookie with many many marbles.

There is a circle-jerk going on.

55 posted on 10/23/2005 6:06:42 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson