Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Calpernia; Ol' Sparky; Stellar Dendrite; Do not dub me shapka broham; bourbon
Yes, you are misunderstanding me. I posted this for all to evaluate where they may be getting their talking points from.

Don't be coy. This is yet another smear attempt on anyone who is openly disappointed with the Meirs nomination.

You know very well that FReepers are exponentially more likely to form opinions on this with no help from the far left groups you have attempted to associate us with.

Your last paragraph means nothing. It's like asking someone if they quit molesting children only to say at the end of the diatribe...heh.."I was just kidding".

87 posted on 10/22/2005 10:01:54 AM PDT by wardaddy (Peace and love and warm hugs to everyone...sandalwood and patchouli too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: wardaddy
I want a conservative Supreme Court with well qualified justices who will have an originalist interpretation of the Constitution. That's my agenda. It's that simple.
131 posted on 10/22/2005 10:23:21 AM PDT by TAdams8591 (I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

To: Calpernia; wardaddy

Lashing out are we?

Liberals and conservatives are united in their disapproval of Miers because she is objectively unqualified for the SCOTUS. I'm sure it's a bitter pill for you to swallow, but her lack of qualifications transcends subjective political opinion. The great majority of people who support this nomination are people who have sworn an oath of fealty to George W. Bush and consider loyalty to him to be the sum total of "conservatism."

So please keep dreaming.


144 posted on 10/22/2005 10:30:55 AM PDT by bourbon (conservatism over cronyism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson