"....there is an absolute panicked campaign"
So, how do you expect to debate the anti-Miers side if you refuse you even acknowledge, or, heaven forbid, see for yourself that, for instance, her lack of judicial experience is a reasonable objection.
You don't stop there though, you associate folks who oppose Miers with leftist, terrorist scum.
Then all you do is whine when people have a strong reaction to what I feel (and apparently with some agreement) is a completely childish reaction to opposition to a nomination that has a basis in reason.
You need to do better than that if you want your points to be taken seriously.
Nice way to splice a post again to change what I said in my post.