Posted on 10/22/2005 9:19:11 AM PDT by Calpernia
I've trusted Bush's pick on her since about the 4th or 5th day of his announcement. I will continue to trust his judgement on her pick.
Info ping. New left agenda domain .
Personally I am so very tired of ALL the nattering nabobs and their rhetoric that I've just been tuning it out.
~</;o)
Must be the reason why National Review is against her ~ these guys were undoubtedly William F. Buckley's MJ dealers ~ probably still are, eh?!
Yep, you got me. I'm a Commie.
Oh, by the way, did you support the defeat of Nazi Germany in WWII?
What? You did? Guess what? You're a Commie too, since the Soviet Union was our ally!
Welcome to the Commie club, comrade!
Buckley belongs to Not In Our Name
Sorry, I wasn't born then.
Hey you know what, I bet some of those organizations support breathing as well. Better hold our breath.
It seems there is good indication she is pro-life. But we have absolutely no idea how she would vote on gun rights, property rights(overturning Kelo vs. New London), affirmative action, State's rights, or any number off issues that are important to conservatives. After how hard we worked to elect Republicans in 2004, we deserve better then this.
Applying that logic, Hitler was a vegetarian, therefore vegetarians are Nazis.
Just because some people oppose Miers doesn't mean they're allied with the Forces of Darkness like MoveOn.org or the other fringies. It means they oppose Miers, and probably for entirely different reasons than those groups.
I assumed, whether or not you were born then, that you were old enough to get the point. My mistake.
Don't forget the evil Robert Bork!
Nope I'm not old enough to get your mistake, er, point. I'm still learning about history since I had the left NEA version given to me in school.
As to your forced in a corner pick of who I support in WW2, I'm still reading about the Nazi Soviet partnership that they had the convention to celebrate in NYC.
So your example doesn't sell.
But that is changing the subject now isn't? Why are you quoting SDS material to make your points?
"Who's"?
I see you're a proud graduate of the Harriet Miers School of Spelling and Punctuation.
If she's pro affirmative action then she doesn't belong on the court, period.
You disgrace yourself with this nonsense.
What logic? You didn't read my post and you are twisting it for your agenda.
READ MY LAST PARAGRAPH.
>>>Make sure if you are not on the side of supporting Miers, it isn't information that came from SDS, Not In Our Name, MoveOn.org, of the NLG.<<<
Look, you can be open with us ~ we're all friends here ~ 'fess up about those lawyers!
If this is the best defense that the pro-Miers side can come up with then they have surely lost.
A typo! The horror! How will anyone understand?
The disgrace!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.