Skip to comments.
Accidental Invention Points to End of Light Bulbs
LiveScience ^
| 10/20/15
| Bjorn Carey
Posted on 10/22/2005 8:12:55 AM PDT by ZGuy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
To: HiJinx
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That was exactly it for me. Saving $$$
21
posted on
10/22/2005 8:54:37 AM PDT
by
Halfmanhalfamazing
(You upgraded to Linux? No, I'm not surprised your computer works properly now. Amazing, no?)
To: Wonder Warthog
All these guys appear to have done is come up with a different formula for the phosphor mix---why is it so much better???? Because they're stretching to get their names in the paper Since few people really know how a white LED works they're more likely to think this stuff is 'hot-$h¡-on-toast' and it'll make all the news shows and science magazines.
22
posted on
10/22/2005 8:56:19 AM PDT
by
solitas
(So what if I support an OS that has fewer flaws than yours? 'Mystic' dual 500 G4's, OSX.4.2)
To: ZGuy
10/21/15 So what, you are a guy from the future coming back to tell us how wonderful everything will be in 10 years? So tell us, who wins the Presidency in 2008? Are their still Democrats in 2015? :-}
23
posted on
10/22/2005 8:57:31 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(I'll try to be NICER, if you will try to be SMARTER!.......Water Buckets UP!)
To: MamaTexan
Close the drawer? Does a lighted fork in a closed drawer continue to emit light?
24
posted on
10/22/2005 8:59:25 AM PDT
by
frithguild
(The CIA launched a covert operation against the President when it sent Wilson to Niger)
To: Radioactive
I was reading where quantum dots could be powered by the human body....tapping into the electrical charge we all have. Finally a way to glow without having sex! How angellic!
25
posted on
10/22/2005 9:02:32 AM PDT
by
frithguild
(The CIA launched a covert operation against the President when it sent Wilson to Niger)
To: ZGuy
this is really wild - truly a leap into the future as i imagined it in my SF books i read forty years ago!
26
posted on
10/22/2005 9:05:32 AM PDT
by
chilepepper
(The map is not the territory -- Alfred Korzybski)
To: Radioactive
27
posted on
10/22/2005 9:08:11 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
(/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
To: ZGuy
You have to bet that Vanderbilt already has title to this patent.
28
posted on
10/22/2005 9:09:59 AM PDT
by
ladyjane
To: MamaTexan
Paint the ceiling with it, run a couple of almost invisible ribbon power strips from a wall-mounted, low -voltage transformer with a mini-receiver and turn on the ceiling or dim it from anywhere with a remote hand control.
29
posted on
10/22/2005 9:10:32 AM PDT
by
Old Professer
(Fix the problem, not the blame!)
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
......We do not offer anything bright enough for general household lighting.....
There is a discrepancy between your post and their website......
30
posted on
10/22/2005 9:10:42 AM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. ; N.P . No Yemanie Cricket jokes please.)
To: Willie Green
Thanks for your real answer. I appreciate it.
To: ZGuy
To: Radioactive
Hey, not just "put those things", have them tatooed as a tasteful design. Could get you on the Martha Stewart show or something!
33
posted on
10/22/2005 9:13:16 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
(/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
To: HiJinx
Boy you got that right. This is going to drive a future stock surge. LEDs could also eliminate the need for more power generators as the energy consumption could be reduced 7% - 14%.
34
posted on
10/22/2005 9:17:54 AM PDT
by
stevio
(Red-Blooded American Male (NRA))
To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Thank you for the link...I have vision difficulties and regular lightbulbs are too yellow for me. So, every room in the house is a combo of "yellow," Ott-Lite, Daylight, Inc., Phillips white, etc. It is maddening, expensive and so hodge podge it looks like I'm running a lamp store.
The expense is worth it if I can figure out what I need so thanks for one more link to explore!
35
posted on
10/22/2005 9:20:35 AM PDT
by
hummingbird
(Think I'll google for a while.....)
To: Betty Jane
How does one turn the light off, particularly on the silverware example?In addition, wouldn't the cord(s) supplying the power, be a pain in the a** at the table? ;-)
36
posted on
10/22/2005 9:24:04 AM PDT
by
varon
(Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
To: frithguild
Does a lighted fork in a closed drawer continue to emit light? Well...YEAH!
(Otherwise, it wouldn't BE a lighted fork, it would be an unlighted one :)
37
posted on
10/22/2005 9:43:41 AM PDT
by
MamaTexan
(~ I am NOT a 'legal entity'....... nor am I a 'person' as created by law ~)
To: Old Professer
Paint the ceiling with it, run a couple of almost invisible ribbon power strips from a wall-mounted, low -voltage transformer with a mini-receiver and turn on the ceiling or dim it from anywhere with a remote hand control. Professor....
You have WAY too much time on your hands!
LOL!
38
posted on
10/22/2005 9:44:42 AM PDT
by
MamaTexan
(~ I am NOT a 'legal entity'....... nor am I a 'person' as created by law ~)
To: ZGuy
The way
florescent lights work is they generate UV light internally, that gets converted to white light by the florescent coating. Seems like quantum-dot "phosphor" coating would work similarly
39
posted on
10/22/2005 9:45:00 AM PDT
by
SauronOfMordor
(I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
To: geezerwheezer
Tried to get my Electrical Contractor brother interested in LED lighting last year : wrong developer. Roentgen discovered X rays and within weeks they were being used in medicine, now it's routine technology. Since there are many companies in the lighting production business it should be mere months before you see this quantum dot/LED concept on the shelves at your local Home Depot/supermarket. Remember the partially silvered bulb that reflects infrared radiation from the filament back to the filament thus re-heating it = more efficiency? Didn't sell too well. Thus it will come down to marketing prowess in lumens/watt/cost that will make or break this concept. To wit, if you don't have a manufacturer/marketer willing to gamble a LOT of money on your invention/discovery...don't even bother getting an expen$ive patent. How many of you out there already know that...
40
posted on
10/22/2005 10:15:30 AM PDT
by
timer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson