I remember that Kathleen Willey did not indicate any problem with Bill Clinton after his alleged "groping" of her. I say "alleged" because it was never proven. She needed a job and the only way she could get employment was to appeal to Bill Clinton, the same person she later accused of sexual advances. BUT...she continued to treat him affably AFTER those transgressions!
Juanita Broaddrick's claim that Slick Willy raped her remains unproven also. How many years went by before she found a reason to report it? Both cases are based on the "he said, she said" scenario. Ergo, how does one conclude both of these women have told the truth, that their accusations CANNOT be in question?
Either or both of these women may be telling the truth, the whole truth. Too bad they don't have a "blue dress" to back up their claims.
Aside from all that, if "that woman", Hillary, runs & wins the presidency in '08, half of the country will have to be inoculated against HPM (Hillary-President-Madness).
By the way, notice out of Bill Clinton's lips he doesn't deny he raped Juanita.
If he ever did that he would be subject to a civil lawsuit and she and all her witnesses would have their day in court against slick Willey.
If he EVER denies himself what she is saying, she can legally go after him for slander.