To: ravingnutter
And isn't it interesting that Wilson told the Senate Intelligence Committee that ... "he concluded the Niger intelligence was based on documents that had clearly been forged because 'the dates were wrong and the names were wrong.' when in fact the docs were not in U.S. hands until eight months after Wilson made his trip to Niger.
And isn't it also interesting that two months after the '03 SOTU speech those docs were found to be forgeries HOWEVER the documents that the IAEA judged to be forgeries were not the same documents that the British based their original assessment on. In fact, one of these reports (the Butler Report) suggested that the forged documents were distributed with the knowing goal of being discovered as obvious forgeries so as to discredit the intelligence.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_C._Wilson#The_Senate_Intelligence_Committee_Report
The CIA's/Wilson/Plame motive has been apparent from the very beginning.
79 posted on
10/21/2005 10:59:55 AM PDT by
blogblogginaway
(<a HREF="http://www.drudgereport.com/">Link to Drudge</a>)
To: blogblogginaway
Time to look into nice Mr. Wilson's private business in Africa AND Swiss bank accounts.
I can't understand for the life of me why Wilson would say "the dates are wrong" on the forgeries. So, he must know the right dates on the real documents.
85 posted on
10/21/2005 11:05:47 AM PDT by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: blogblogginaway
Thanks for your interesting post. Do we dare hope that Fitzgerald unravels this conspiracy and blatant attempt to falsley blame the Bush administration? I'm praying he will exonerate those being framed by traitors in the CIA and that their identies will be disclosed.
I know its unlikely, but I can hope can't I?
86 posted on
10/21/2005 11:06:20 AM PDT by
demkicker
(I BELIEVE CONGRESSMAN WELDON!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson