To: procomone
I wish the Lamestream Media would make up their minds on whether indictments are coming or not - I guess it shows just how little they know!
6 posted on
10/21/2005 7:16:41 AM PDT by
Yossarian
To: Yossarian
OK, I'm confused: Indictments not likely but other indictments are??
11 posted on
10/21/2005 7:19:10 AM PDT by
Dansong
To: Yossarian
I wish the Lamestream Media would make up their minds on whether indictments are coming or not - I guess it shows just how little they know! I agree... there is a link on Drudge to another story from the Slimes saying that a lawyer has leaked information that Rove and Libby are "in serious legal jeopardy". WTF? http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/21/politics/21leak.html?ei=5090&en=24929ddc4cf51529&ex=1287547200&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print
17 posted on
10/21/2005 7:21:26 AM PDT by
golfboy
(character is doing what is right, when no one is looking)
To: Yossarian
I guess it shows just how little they know! BINGO!
36 posted on
10/21/2005 7:33:35 AM PDT by
Mo1
To: Yossarian
Didn't this same rag predict indictments?
Can they get their stories straight?
42 posted on
10/21/2005 7:35:15 AM PDT by
Panic in the Streets
("Mayor, I've confirmed the data: the hippies ARE planning a massive jam band concert!"- Eric Cartman)
To: Yossarian
Such news "items" are meant to drag their names through the mud. If they can get 4 weeks of negative press and "drop" the story the day after the man is cleared, the public will walk away with a negative perception of Republicans.
Some will never hear the exoneration. Some will have nagging doubt. And some will consider future charges "par for the course".
Of course some realize that this is just the MSM throwing mud and crying wolf.
50 posted on
10/21/2005 7:39:27 AM PDT by
weegee
(To understand the left is to rationalize how abortion can be a birthright.)
To: Yossarian
They are probably doing a CYA. Think about it. It's illegal to leak GJ testimony. This case is investigating a leak of a CIA person's name and the Prosecutor has thrown people in jail over it (even though he knows no law was broken). So what do you think he'll do if he believes someone illegally leaked GJ testimony?
He might just lock up all the press until they reveal the source.
By hedging off initial reports they can say they were just wildly speculating.
64 posted on
10/21/2005 7:49:02 AM PDT by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: Yossarian
Yeah, I cant reconcile these two developments, supposedly both from the NY Slimes.
Drudge still has the following headline:
NYT: Rove and Libby have been advised that they may be in serious legal jeopardy...
While Newsmax has this headline:
NY Times: Karl Rove, Lewis Libby Likely Cleared on Leakgate Charges
WHICH IS IT?
78 posted on
10/21/2005 8:02:34 AM PDT by
Tatze
(I voted for John Kerry before I voted against him!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson