Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Author Hopes Book Will Dispel 'Harmless Fun' Myths About Porn
Agape Press ^ | 10/20/05 | Mary Rettig

Posted on 10/20/2005 4:56:55 PM PDT by wagglebee

A contributor to Time magazine says contemporary society has been misled into believing pornography is harmless entertainment. According to Pamela Paul, author of Pornified: How Pornography Is Transforming Our Lives, Our Relationships, and Our Families (Times Books, 2005), what was once hidden in dark alleys and seedy theaters is now being glorified and mainstreamed by today's "pornified" culture.

"There's an idea that pornography is cool and that it's perfectly normal for men to look at pornography -- that they are biologically programmed to want to look at pornography," Paul says.

And, she notes, women have been "a serious target of this message in that they are told pornography is a guy thing, and that it's not their right to complain."

In fact, Paul says, the mainstreaming of pornography has taught a generation of women to believe that porn is for the independent and liberated. But that idea could not be more wrong, she asserts, because in reality porn victimizes women, poisons men, and causes children to grow up too fast.

In her book, Pornified, Paul assembles a compilation of surveys and other research as well as anecdotal evidence of the problems porn causes. Of particular concern, she points out, are stories of young children and teens accessing pornography from school computers.

The Time magazine feature writer says it is "very disturbing" that researchers are not exactly sure how exposure to porn is going to affect children down the road. "But it's clear that kids develop sexually during adolescence," she adds, "and they learn what their sexual cues are -- what's exciting, what's appealing" to them.

"If kids are looking at hardcore pornography online and learning that this is what's normal and that this is what is supposed to be exciting and this is what they're supposed to aspire to, they're learning a very scary lesson," Paul says. And her own research indicates that the damage caused by youngsters' exposure to porn could be both extensive and long term.

In a survey the author conducted herself, the overwhelming majority of respondents cited a long list of negative effects from pornography use, including poor relationship skills and serious trust and loyalty issues. Responses also indicated that porn can lead to negative body image issues in women and can distract men from their partners, detract from their sexual skills, and damage their relationships.

Paul contends that pornography is obviously a poison and that it has unfortunately seeped into many people's everyday lives. She hopes her book will help dispel contemporary society's misconceptions that pornography is in any way normal, hip or harmless.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bookreview; internet; moralabsolutes; myth; nekidchicks; pamelapaul; porn; pornography
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
To: Moral Hazard
What about the benefit of the sexual gratification of the viewer?

What benefit? Is eating cherry-flavored poison beneficial?

The purpose of the reproductive system isn't self-gratification but... (drumroll please)... reproduction. The purpose of reproduction is the continuation of society. And children are best prepared for life in society when they are raised by their natural parents. So sexual intercourse is intended for the unity of husband and wife and the creation of children.

61 posted on 10/21/2005 10:03:22 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
>They're unaffected? How do you know that?

Porn can be a source
of good. Men and women learn
new techniques to share

their love. People learn
their "quirks" are shared by many.
And, almost all porn

is non-violent
to an extreme. And women
typically take charge.

Mainstream porn, that is.
I wouldn't call it great stuff,
but it's not evil.

62 posted on 10/21/2005 10:05:50 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Pornography much like homosexuality is best left to discretion.

Quiet


63 posted on 10/21/2005 10:09:39 AM PDT by wardaddy (Peace and love and warm hugs to everyone...sandalwood and patchouli too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudgemAll
>The media and the gov are in bed in this, of course

How come you didn't.
use colors?! They look more nuts
than just SIZE and bold!

64 posted on 10/21/2005 10:10:13 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ostlandr
What I'm trying to say is, if nobody bought the smut, and women (and men) refused to pose or perform, the entire porn industry would dry up and blow away.

If people stopped murdering people the entire murder problem would dry up and blow away...

We can't criminalize everything that's intrinsically evil, but there's little downside to criminalizing porn. The worst that would happen is that it would go back underground, where it belongs.

65 posted on 10/21/2005 10:15:00 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
She said that Playboy was evil, and Hefner was a tool of the devil

She was right. Look into the history of Playboy. Except for perhaps Kinsey and Freud, no one was more responsible for changing societal norms regarding pornography.

66 posted on 10/21/2005 10:19:47 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Release the porn hounds!!!

Image hosted by Photobucket.com

67 posted on 10/21/2005 10:25:07 AM PDT by Freedom_Fighter_2001 (When money is no object - it's your money they're talking about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: theFIRMbss
Porn can be a source of good. Men and women learn new techniques to share

And shooting at passing cars can teach good marksmanship.

See Isaiah 5:20

68 posted on 10/21/2005 10:26:51 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
"So sexual intercourse is intended for the unity of husband and wife and the creation of children."

So what if the couple gets a little bored with their "Unity"? Would it be alright, in your opinion, to try and spice it up a little with some normal hetro porn and maybe some toys or other aids?
69 posted on 10/21/2005 10:32:52 AM PDT by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Senator Bedfellow
Actually, the Nazis banned pornography in 1933.

So.. using the logic that was earlier displayed here, NOT having pornography is clearly a Nazi attribute...
70 posted on 10/21/2005 10:37:41 AM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: najida
Snopes says snuff films haven't been proven to exist. My gut says otherwise.

Snuff films almost certainly exist. It's impossible to know what people film when there are no other witnesses. What doesn't exist is any kind of Snuff film industry or distribution. There isn't a ring of Snuff film distributors out there and real snuff films aren't available to the public. Al Goldstein (of Screw fame) was one of the people who researched this phenomenon, even offering a reward to anyone who could lead him in the direction of a real snuff film. No takers.
71 posted on 10/21/2005 10:41:07 AM PDT by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
So what if the couple gets a little bored with their "Unity"? Would it be alright, in your opinion, to try and spice it up a little with some normal hetro porn and maybe some toys or other aids?

Opinions don't matter. What matters is what's true.

We observe in the world around us that children are best raised by their natural and united parents. Intercourse serves to unite parents.

When couples watch strangers engage in sexual acts their sexual desires are directed at others, and not at each other.

Others have posted above examples of the corrosive effect of pornography on couples' unity.

72 posted on 10/21/2005 10:49:03 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: najida

One could argue, I guess, that those romance/softcore novels written for women by women ought to be criminalized as well. At least in some individual women, they might foster an over-active fantasy life and create unrealistic expectations with respect to sexual relations between real men and women.

If men should really read these books, can we assert that women should really view male-targeted porn to get a clue about what men want?


73 posted on 10/21/2005 11:03:06 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

To a certain degree, yes, I think lots of women can look at porn and get an idea of what men like (no hassles or emotions, bj's and big boobs).

The biggest difference to me between men and women is that, a man will always get his orgasm.

Again, one of my reasons for (JOKINGLY) thinking that men and women need to live on different continents.


74 posted on 10/21/2005 11:07:45 AM PDT by najida (The internet is for kids grown up-- Where else could you have 10,000 imaginary friends?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Senator Bedfellow
"I like to drive a car and use power tools from time to time, but I don't want my kids doing those things. Do you suppose my conscience is telling me that cars and chainsaws are immoral?"

HUH? WHA? No I don't suppose that...so what? But actually your conscience is telling you that cars and chainsaws are dangerous and if you would feel guilty if you did not warn your children not to operate them.

Let me try again. If you like to watch porn but you would not want your children to watch it or to know that YOU watch it OR if you would not want YOUR children to grow up to be porn stars, then it follows that you KNOW there is something wrong with watching porn or performing porn and that you really should not be doing it. Unless of course your conscience is DEAD or you are lying to yourself that it's just a little porn and never hurt anybody. (Well that girl or guy on screen is somebody's daughter or son, but thank God not YOURS because you would not want your kid to be doing the very sleezy thing that you LIKE to watch.

And this is one way in which someone, who is HONEST with him or her self could come to the truth of the matter. Pornograpy is an affront to human dignity. It cheapens everybody involved in it.

75 posted on 10/21/2005 1:22:27 PM PDT by Hound of the Baskervilles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
" "hey, it's better than going out and picking up a disease from some random woman at bar"."

I think this is lame. I stole a $100.00 but I could have stolen $1000.00. Oh well I am not going to pontificate anymore. I've had my say.

76 posted on 10/21/2005 1:27:46 PM PDT by Hound of the Baskervilles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: najida
Porn stars and their behaviors are about 180 from what a real woman needs and expects.

Wait just a minute there, are you trying to tell me that when my wife walks in on me having sex with another woman, she won't strip off her clothes and join in??? Damn, there go my plans for Saturday night...

77 posted on 10/21/2005 1:38:56 PM PDT by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: mikegi

LOL!

Only if your plans for Saturday night are picking buckshot out of your backside ;)


78 posted on 10/21/2005 1:41:52 PM PDT by najida (The internet is for kids grown up-- Where else could you have 10,000 imaginary friends?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Junior

Ping


79 posted on 10/21/2005 1:44:06 PM PDT by cjshapi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: unspun

Jimmy Carter :^)


80 posted on 10/21/2005 1:47:26 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson