To: wideawake
Leaving threatening letters on people's private property is not cool.If the letter were actually threatening, you can bet your dupa they'd have quoted it. So we know that it wasn't threatening--the lady reading it merely "felt threatened". There's a big difference. She's exercising property rights; the pastor is exercising free-speach rights; only an idiot (and a reporter) could get together and construe that the two were somehow mutually exclusive.
6 posted on
10/20/2005 11:15:25 AM PDT by
Shalom Israel
(Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
To: Shalom Israel
She's exercising property rights; the pastor is exercising free-speach rights; only an idiot (and a reporter) could get together and construe that the two were somehow mutually exclusive Well, not mutually. The pastor has no free-speech rights on her property.
282 posted on
10/20/2005 4:10:25 PM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
(Paging Nehemiah Scudder:the Crazy Years are peaking. America is ready for you.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson