"Just like my right to free snickers bars."
I know you really don't like to admit when you're wrong, none of us do, but now you're just being silly. As each of your attempts to support your initial contention, "there is no right of privacy" gets knocked down, you get farther afield and ultimately resort to this. It's sad really.
Your cohorts have made it clear that homosexual sex performed in private is Constitutional, and in particular that anti-sodomy laws (of the sort passed in all the framers' home states) are unconstitutional. Does your interpretation of the ninth amendment support or oppose this viewpoint? What about prostitution? If those can be illegalized, what judicial standard distinguishes those behaviors from the ones that can be?