Your cohorts have made it clear that homosexual sex performed in private is Constitutional, and in particular that anti-sodomy laws (of the sort passed in all the framers' home states) are unconstitutional. Does your interpretation of the ninth amendment support or oppose this viewpoint? What about prostitution? If those can be illegalized, what judicial standard distinguishes those behaviors from the ones that can be?
"Your cohorts have made it clear that homosexual sex performed in private is Constitutional, and in particular that anti-sodomy laws (of the sort passed in all the framers' home states) are unconstitutional."
I wasn't aware that I had any cohorts.
"Does your interpretation of the ninth amendment support or oppose this viewpoint?"
Oppose of course. Anyone who would think otherwise would have to be a judicial activist.
"What about prostitution? If those can be illegalized, what judicial standard distinguishes those behaviors from the ones that can be?"
There is no constitutional basis to prevent states from enacting anti-prostitution laws, including the right of privacy. Next?