Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack of all Trades

THANKS for the post! I am always interested in new technology!..........


10 posted on 10/19/2005 11:22:41 AM PDT by Red Badger (In life, you don't get what you deserve. You get what you settle for...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger

Very cool. What is missing from the animation is the cylinder, which is still what is driving the whole thing. So whats really different is the replacement of the main shaft set up with the direct cam things. It's not a Wankle variant as I first thought.

I don't get this comment at all "The piston assembly slides rigidly through the block eliminating piston to cylinder-bore contact."

How can you eliminate piston to bore contact. Presumably the piston still has to be tight to the cylinder to facilitate controlled combustion, and preventing fuel from blowing back into the cams (which must require lubrication).

Anyone get what they are talking about?

It looks too bulky for motorycle application.

What's wrong with the Wankle? Why did only Mazda use it?


18 posted on 10/19/2005 11:37:27 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson