Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pacers' Jackson calls ban on chains 'racist statement'
ESPN.com ^ | Oct. 19, 2005 | Marc Stein

Posted on 10/19/2005 6:57:39 AM PDT by Niteranger68

INDIANAPOLIS -- Indiana Pacers guard Stephen Jackson, contending that a league ban on chains worn over clothing is "a racist statement" from the league, wore every long, diamond-studded chain in his collection Tuesday night as a protest.

Jackson voiced no opposition to the bulk of the "business casual" demands in the NBA's new dress code, but he described the jewelry ban as "attacking young black males."

"I think it's a racist statement because a lot of the guys who are wearing chains are my age and are black," said Jackson, 27. "I wore all my jewelry today to let it be known that I'm upset with it.

"I'll wear a suit every day. I think we do need to look more professional because it is a business. A lot of guys have gotten sloppy with the way they dress. But it's one thing to [enforce a] dress code and it's another thing if you're attacking cultures, and that's what I think they're doing."

Jackson made his comments before Tuesday's home exhibition game against San Antonio, with the four chains he wore to work hanging in his locker -- one sporting his initials, two with a crucifix and a fourth depicting Jesus Christ.

A section in the new dress code listing items players are not allowed to wear on team or league business includes "chains, pendants or medallions worn over the player's clothing."

"I know a lot of guys on my team are upset and I have no problem speaking up on it," Jackson said.

Jackson, though, said he wouldn't openly defy the rule if it means he keeps "giving money back" in fines.

San Antonio's Tim Duncan, far less vocal but also a critic of the new policy, did not play in Tuesday's game and sat on the bench wearing an untucked shirt and baggy jeans -- attire that could result in a fine if seen during a regular-season game.

A specific range of penalties has yet to be announced, but league officials have already made it clear that violators of the dress code will be fined -- as well as their teams -- with repeat violators subject to suspension.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: RacerF150

SHUT UP AND PLAY BASKETBALL, IDIOT...that is what you're being paid to do! If you want to wear your chains and fancy clothes, change vocations and become a pimp!


21 posted on 10/19/2005 7:18:27 AM PDT by meandog (FUDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: RacerF150

"San Antonio's Tim Duncan, far less vocal but also a critic of the new policy, did not play in Tuesday's game and sat on the bench wearing an untucked shirt and baggy jeans -- attire that could result in a fine if seen during a regular-season game."

The NBA is paying the price for allowing the once great game of pro basketball to morph into thugball.


23 posted on 10/19/2005 7:20:28 AM PDT by Rebelbase (""As far as I can tell, she (Miers) is every bit as conservative as George Bush." --NCsteve (FR))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

A UCONN booster who had to decide which NCAA championship game to go to because the man's and women's teams were both playing, told SI that he prefered the women's game. When asked the biggest difference he responded. "the women wear less jewelery".


24 posted on 10/19/2005 7:20:32 AM PDT by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RacerF150

Racist?

When the word "racist" is used, it means attacking someone in regards to their race, the way they were born. I was unaware that "young black men" were born with gold chains over their clothes. This must be terribly uncomfortable for their mothers.

Mark


25 posted on 10/19/2005 7:28:45 AM PDT by MarkL (I didn't get to where I am today by worrying about what I'd feel like tomorrow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

NBA players set an example for the gangbangers in your town...


26 posted on 10/19/2005 7:35:51 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Troubled by NOLA looting ? You ain't seen nothing yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker

My heart bleeds. I think we would do well to start a
SAVE THE CHAINS donation thread here and in our neighborhoods. "OFF THE OPPRESSING SLAVEHOLDING CAPITILISTIC SWINE LEAGUE MASTERS WHO STOMP ALL OVER OUR MANHOOD BY DISSING OUR CHAINS" could be the rallying cry.
But we must gain support of all freedom loving peoples
remind them today it is thugee chains- but tommorrow it will be Golf Pants.


27 posted on 10/19/2005 7:40:39 AM PDT by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Today's NBA players just don't get it. The league is rightfully trying to get rid of the hip-hop/thug image that is alienating fans, and return to playing real basketball.

That is precisely what drove me away from the league. I wanted to enjoy a good sport, not watch a hip hop lifestyle paraded in front of my eyes. Which is why college football is the best sport going.

28 posted on 10/19/2005 7:48:52 AM PDT by Scourge of God (What goes here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RacerF150

Using modern Leftist logic, chains are a symbol of slavery. One can then assume that the NBA is just being politically correct by removing such symbols.


29 posted on 10/19/2005 8:16:58 AM PDT by Right Brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RacerF150

Bling ping


30 posted on 10/19/2005 8:33:04 AM PDT by Ben Mugged (Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil. - Thomas Mann)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oyez

Marc Stein, is that a Mark Steyn knockoff?


31 posted on 10/19/2005 8:34:23 AM PDT by printhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: meandog

This guy is is fast becoming the second major embarassment for the Pacers after Ron Artest. With knuckleheads like Jackson and Artest in the Pacer locker room, the Pacers are going to miss the maturity and professional demeanor of Reggie Miller before the end of the season. He kept these children focused. If they get off to a slow start, watch for the team chemistry to implode.


32 posted on 10/19/2005 8:38:18 AM PDT by HoosierFather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RacerF150
What an idiot. If black people think their entire cultural identity is defined by a chain around the neck, baggy pants and an over sized shirt then the black people as a whole are in deep doo doo. As long as the black people hold idiots like this up as an example for their culture then black problems will never be solved. (Such as the complete destruction of the black family unit)

Black men like Jackson who simply have a bone to pick with Whitey need racism in order to feel the gratifying and doping feeling of opposition and contradiction for anything deemed WHITE.
33 posted on 10/19/2005 8:39:24 AM PDT by SQUID
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syberyenta

Imagine if the dress code required chains?

That would be discriminatory against three-point shooters.


34 posted on 10/19/2005 9:26:06 AM PDT by Sensei Ern (Now, IB4Z! Can I put my blog address as my tag? http://trss.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RacerF150
I do think that some dress codes do have a racially insensitive component to them, particularly when they deal with hairstyles and colors. I'm not sure that this one has a "racial" component so much as it has a "cultural' component, which really is the whole point of a lot of dress codes, anyway. My guess is that nobody would have a problem with reasonable jewelry but that this particular rule is "zero tolerance" because like all "zero tolerance" rules, they don't want to be dragged into having to define a specific line between what's tasteful and what's not, so they just banned it all. If they trusted the fashion sense of the players, they wouldn't need a dress code because, in my experience, dress codes always go into a lot of detail about certain things because they've been abused in the past.
35 posted on 10/19/2005 10:15:51 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RacerF150

Gee...most of the rest of the world must dress in a certain way to satisfy the company's image. Only these spoiled athletes think they are above all that. Of course, I don't recall to many pictures of the San Antonio Spurs dressing like pimps in the 'hood, so I guess it's not really necessary, Mr. Jackson.


36 posted on 10/19/2005 2:48:50 PM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson