Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons
Justice Thomas was a Judge for a year before, he was nominated.

Harriet Miers qualifications for the Supreme Court are as thin as her paper trail which is virtually transparent.

She is not only the least qualified candidate to be nominated in recent memory, but she was the least qualified known candidate on the president's list.

83 posted on 10/18/2005 11:34:42 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (It's the Supreme Court, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: TAdams8591; nopardons

nopardons never said Thomas wasn;t a judge -- she correctly stated that he had a thin paper trail.

She may very well be the least qualified (not a judge) on his list, but she is the one he knows best. Personally and professionally, which led him to state that she won;t take a left turn once on the bench.


84 posted on 10/18/2005 11:38:43 PM PDT by onyx ((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

To: TAdams8591
And even so, Justice Thomas had a VERY thin paper trail. Please don't take my word for it; look it up for yourself.

And just WHY ( please be detailed and specific ) is Harriet Miers "the least qualified candidate to be nominated in recent memory." ?

There actually are NO listed qualifications, listed anywhere, for justices for the SCOTUS. Are you aware of that? And such vastly superior nominees, such as O'Connor and Kennedy and Souter and Warren and Ginsberg and on and on and on and on, gave us some of THE worst "opinions" handed down and NOT to be found in the Constitution; "penumbras" be damned!

91 posted on 10/18/2005 11:47:35 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson