To: HAL9000
Why protect an inefficient trade at the expense of the American consumer?
I though NAFTA was supposed to tear down trade barriers like this...
4 posted on
10/18/2005 3:17:45 AM PDT by
RWR8189
(George Allen 2008)
To: RWR8189
"I though NAFTA was supposed to tear down trade barriers like this..."Welfare states then feel they're bring victimized somehow, like the chronic dependants in NO who refused to evacuate and then expected their government to save them and make all the mess go away overnight.
11 posted on
10/18/2005 3:53:23 AM PDT by
cake_crumb
(They're Not Conservative Enough! Get a Rope so We Can Hang Ourselves!)
To: RWR8189
I though NAFTA was supposed to tear down trade barriers like thisIt was supposed to, but the U.S. decided to apply tarrifs and ignore the WTO and NAFTA rulings on the matter. What's the point of NAFTA if the U.S. isn't going to play by the rules?
28 posted on
10/18/2005 5:54:10 AM PDT by
doc30
(Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson