Skip to comments.
Q&A: Gary Bauer on the Miers Nomination
Stan Guthrie ^
| October 15, 2005
| Stan Guthrie
Posted on 10/17/2005 2:40:50 PM PDT by Cautor
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Ping
1
posted on
10/17/2005 2:40:53 PM PDT
by
Cautor
To: Stellar Dendrite
2
posted on
10/17/2005 2:41:56 PM PDT
by
Cautor
To: Cautor
"The fallout could be tremendous."
Take that to the bank.
Tell me why we keep voting for Republicans? I keep forgetting.....
3
posted on
10/17/2005 2:44:48 PM PDT
by
Conservative Goddess
(Politiae legibus, non leges politiis, adaptandae)
To: Cautor
"Even if Miers turns out to be a pleasant surprise, her nomination has validated the stealth strategy and gives us no assurances that there wont be another David Souter next time."
That's an argument I have not seen anybody else make... And I think he has a point although I still support the President.
4
posted on
10/17/2005 2:45:36 PM PDT
by
gondramB
(Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)
To: Conservative Goddess
Tell me why we keep voting for Republicans? I keep forgetting.....And your choise is? See, they've got it all calculated. Just as Jesse Jackson in reality doesn't want his issues resolved, neither do certain key republicans, a not the usual suspects. If they get the job done, then why would we need them.
5
posted on
10/17/2005 2:47:23 PM PDT
by
joesbucks
To: Conservative Goddess
Mainly because they will fight our enemies. It is unfortunate that now they have to watch their backs to keep "conservatives" knives out of them.
To: Cautor
Gary is right. Some of us (including myself) really have thrown in the towel for now. Novak had it right: Is this what we fought for? Harriet Miers?!?! Not me. If they persist with her, this gentleman is going to put his election year efforts into golf in 2006 and 2008. Had I (and many of us) known we would get Harriet Miers nominated, John Kerry would be President right now - plain and simple. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (his title in 2007) is going to be a powerful man in about 15 months. But we need a majority! For....um....you know....stuff......
7
posted on
10/17/2005 2:48:15 PM PDT
by
TitansAFC
("It would be a hard government that should tax its people 1/10th part of their income."-Ben Franklin)
To: justshutupandtakeit
"Mainly because they will fight our enemies."
Unless they're called Democrats.
8
posted on
10/17/2005 2:50:01 PM PDT
by
Cautor
To: Cautor
Nothing could provide any "assurances that there wont be another David Souter next time". The next time depends on too many things - both "known unknowns" and "unknown unknowns". And "if Miers turns out to be a pleasant surprise" quite a lot of people would have a rotten egg on their faces.
9
posted on
10/17/2005 2:51:18 PM PDT
by
GSlob
To: Conservative Goddess
I read his father's lips and voted third party.
I have played Lucy and the Football with the GOP since 1968. I am ready to tell the GOP to stuff it!
10
posted on
10/17/2005 2:52:14 PM PDT
by
~Matahari
(Are the Bible and U.S. Constitution "living documents" ?)
To: TitansAFC; flashbunny
11
posted on
10/17/2005 2:52:28 PM PDT
by
Cautor
To: Cautor
That one is not as easy as you pretend. We can't drop daisy cutters on them unfortunately.
To: Cautor
Didn't this guy back McCain in 2000?
13
posted on
10/17/2005 2:52:37 PM PDT
by
lormand
(Dead people vote DemocRAT)
To: Texas Federalist; Rodney King; ARealMothersSonForever; NixonsAngryGhost; indcons; 2ndreconmarine; ..
14
posted on
10/17/2005 2:54:02 PM PDT
by
Stellar Dendrite
( Mike Pence for President!!! http://acuf.org/issues/issue34/050415pol.asp)
To: Cautor
I used to listen to Gary Bauer, but years ago finally figured out he was just a whiner.
He hasn't changed.
To: GSlob
"Nothing could provide any "assurances that there wont be another David Souter next time".
When I go to the horse races, I try to pick the ones with the best chance of winning based on their prior track records. I don't gamble on an unproven horse. Nothing is assured when it comes to judges, but some candidates are more assuring than others.
16
posted on
10/17/2005 2:54:47 PM PDT
by
Cautor
I was over at the Medved vs. Frum thread--all for Miers all the time--but this is where my head says the real understanding of this issue lies...I hope the good woman withdraws her name from nomination.
To: Conservative Goddess
Tell me why we keep voting for Republicans? I keep forgetting..... They are driving us over the cliff 5 mph slower than the democrats are.
18
posted on
10/17/2005 2:57:37 PM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: Cautor
I do not go to horse races at all. And I find it rather amusing that many people are as apoplectic as if GWB nominated hillary. He hasn't.
19
posted on
10/17/2005 2:58:18 PM PDT
by
GSlob
To: Conservative Goddess
Tell me why we keep voting for Republicans? I keep forgetting..... Because no matter how many times Lucy pulls the football away, you still dream of the day you might actually kick it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson