Posted on 10/15/2005 10:25:10 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
JEFFERSON, Texas - Next to a lifelike replica of a giant ape head, the believers milled around tables Saturday covered with casts of large footprints, books about nature's mysteries and T-shirts proclaiming "Bigfoot: Often Imitated, Never Invalidated."
While they can have a sense of humor about it, the search for the legendary Sasquatch is no joke for many of the nearly 400 people who came here to discuss the latest sightings and tracking techniques at the Texas Bigfoot Conference.
"It's not a matter of believing, like faith, when you believe in something you can't see," said Daryl G. Colyer, a Lorena businessman who has investigated hundreds of reported Bigfoot sightings in Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana.
"It's a flesh-and-blood animal that just has not been discovered yet. And I think we're getting closer and closer and closer," Colyer said.
Outlandish theories about the origin of Bigfoot abound, including that it might be an extraterrestrial. Many believe that a towering, ape-like creature descended from a prehistoric 9- to 10-foot-tall gorilla called a Gigantopithecus, and that it now inhabits North American forests.
Hoaxes have been a large part of the making of the Bigfoot legend. California construction company owner Ray L. Wallace donned 16-inch wooden feet to create tracks in mud in 1958, and it led to a front-page story in a local paper that coined the term "Bigfoot."
But there have been more than 2,550 seemingly credible Bigfoot sightings reported in North America the past century, according to Christopher L. Murphy's 2004 book "Meet the Sasquatch."
Murphy believes thousands more witnesses are too afraid of ridicule to come forward.
"You see one of these things and it changes your whole perception of reality," said Craig Woolheater, the office manager of a Dallas company who co-founded the Texas Bigfoot Research Center in 1999, five years after he said he saw a hairy creature walking along a remote Louisiana road.
Colyer and others estimate that about 2,000 are in North America today, reclusive nocturnal animals living in thickly wooded areas with waterways, eating meat and plants and making nests out of trees and brush.
Pictures and film footage are often disputed, such as the 1967 footage of a creature walking near a California creek. Most evidence centers on hundreds of casts of footprints collected since the 1950s.
Jimmy Chilcutt, a retired fingerprint analysis expert for the Conroe Police Department, said many of the hundreds of prints he examined belonged to a primate, but not a human, ape, gorilla or chimpanzee.
Like Chilcutt, other well-respected professionals have come forward to say such evidence should not be dismissed.
"To me it's still an open question, but here's some evidence that warrants some serious consideration, so give it a chance," said Jeff Meldrum, associate professor of anatomy and anthropology at Idaho State University who has studied more than 150 casts of footprints. "This is not a paranormal question; it's a biological question."
___
On the Net:
Texas Bigfoot Research Center: http://www.texasbigfoot.com
So more people showed up for a Bigfoot conference than showed up at an Al Franken Air America remote and it sounds like they actually stayed for the whole thing.
"La di da di da... Hey, who is taking my picture? Ooh I hate that!..la di da"
Thanks for pinging me. Bigfoot sightings are so numerous that dismissing them out of hand is not practical.
Hey you want to see some stuff that will make you freak, you should get into ghosts...I do believe they exist from personal experience and seeing quite a bit of evidence from other people. I don`t know if I would call them "ghosts" or spirits, but maaan, I tell you there is something to this the more you look into it. Here is one that will make your hair stand on end...
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/media/displayimage.php?album=8&pos=4
There's no conclusive evidence for evolution. I'll take God thanks.
First off, I have to say that I really did laugh out loud at your narrative and pic of bigfoot... thanks, that was awesome.. : )
Secondly, I was afraid someone would not be able to see the first video.. (I know, William eventually saw it) Anyhow, I posted it on my new account at PutFiles.
http://media.putfile.com/Sasquatch-Bigfoot---NY-Baby-Video
I can play it in DivX Player (it's free) and on Windows Media Player. I think since it is an .Avi video files, I needed first the DivX codec downloads. You may or may not need it. I'm unsure if the browser is enough for you to see the video.
I'll return... enjoy.
Without conclusive proof?
I'm not telling you what to believe. The Bible is enough for me and I'm quite happy with that. Believe whatever you want. Thanks.
Hmmm, they have a bigfoot conference, and not one bigfoot showed up.
The truth is out there. And it's standing behind that tree.
question: do you think this bigfoot search and topic directly relates to Evolution? I don't think so... Do you remember Ota Benga.. they pygmy that was placed in the NY Zoological exhibit at the beginning of this century? I would venture to guess that if bigfoot does exist it will turn out to be as meaningless to evolution as Ota Benga.
Maybe I'm not understanding the debate you are having with the other guy.... I'll go back and read...
Thanks.
I you haven't seen it and would like it send me a private message.
I'll be willing to snip it. Make it a series of 4 video files..... say, 2 MB each and I'll email the clips to you... : )
: ) I thought you would like that.
There IS no debate. I was just stating my point of view. I am not into crevo debates.
I stand corrected, and I must say you have the best screenname on Freep.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.