"is not tied down by terminology and past perceptions. All that we know that involves any high-level thought is nothing but mathematics. Her mind has been trained to think of things more deeply, more generally, and to relate seemingly unrelatable things."
That doesn't make me any more confident she won't be a progressive activist judge on the Supreme Court.
People who think as you describe it are like those who thought Darwinism proved we can "evolve" society to a central leadership's goals. Perhaps she'd of been better suited for Stalin or Mao's regimes?
Biology? You're kidding, right? People go into bio because they can't hack the math.