Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trubluolyguy
I do not believe in a judicial oligarchy. The laws are ours and if our laws are nothing but the playthings of the legal class, we have lost our Democracy.

Look at it this way, 7 of 9 of the smartest and most qualified lawyers (I won't address that oxymoron) decided it was in the Constitution. You have no right to argue.

72 posted on 10/15/2005 3:53:13 PM PDT by AmishDude (If Miers isn't qualified, neither are you and you have no right to complain about any SC decision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: AmishDude

72 refers to Roe v. Wade, BTW.


76 posted on 10/15/2005 3:55:12 PM PDT by AmishDude (If Miers isn't qualified, neither are you and you have no right to complain about any SC decision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: AmishDude

A solution would be for Congress to limit the scope of what the SCOTUS can deliberate on.

As most of this Republic's history has shown, there is the tendency to push controversial problems into the courts, and away from the political arena.

GWB choosing to avoid things like same sex marriage, abortion, affirmative action, emminent domain and so on, is continuing to avoid these issues by opting for "non-politically polarizing" figures for the SCOTUS.

He sure has egg on his face this time. There *are* issues of the day which need to be hammered out, and can't be pushed away forever. The political process is here to deal with them. Abdicating your duty will only result in very poor poll ratings and intra-party conflict.


100 posted on 10/15/2005 4:04:57 PM PDT by Frank T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson