Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

Thanks for the comment but I don't think I meant it like you took it.

It was a comment on a stement I read.

It's hard to get an idea in writing, for me, to come out like I wanted it to.


271 posted on 10/15/2005 7:00:30 PM PDT by frannie (Be not afraid of tomorrow - God is already there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]


To: frannie
Thanks for the comment but I don't think I meant it like you took it. It was a comment on a stement I read.

You did fine. I was making a joke.

The objective qualifications for SCOTUS represent an easy hurdle to cross - Schroeder does qualify under that standard.

The subjective standard is set by the Senate, during its advise & consent procedure. The President is also amenable to hearing from the public, in the interests of serving the wishes of "We the People."

272 posted on 10/15/2005 7:05:06 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson