Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. fiscal '05 deficit falls to $319 billion!!! (emphasis added)
MarketWatch.com (by Dow Jones) ^ | 10/14/05 | William L. Watts

Posted on 10/14/2005 12:54:17 PM PDT by SierraWasp

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last
To: SierraWasp

Yeah - that's great news! /sarc

They only get to that number by conveniently borrowing the off-budget surpluses of approx $176 billion and not reporting a cent of it. Count that in and the deficit dropped only about $60 billion, all the way down to $500 billion or so. And that's not even accounting for the future spending of promises made now, such as medicare prescription drug benefits, which we should be saving for now to pay for later rather than forcing our children to pay for that benefit in 30 years.

Anyway, if you just count the raiding of off-budget surpluses, the deficit isn't projected to drop below $480 billion anytime in the next 10 years if W gets his way. If you let tax cuts expire, the projection is a $183 billion deficit in 2015.

Thats still horrendously bad, folks. Tax reductions ***ONLY*** work with equivalent cuts in spending, tax hikes elsewhere, or when they mask a general simplification of the tax code.... They don't work when you increase spending faster than LBJ at the same time.


41 posted on 10/14/2005 1:40:35 PM PDT by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

spending related to Hurricane Katrina [and the idiotic refusal of Republican leaders to cut even a dime of pork to pay for it] is likely to drive up red ink</p>


42 posted on 10/14/2005 1:42:29 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Money borrowed from CHINA?


43 posted on 10/14/2005 1:45:24 PM PDT by cake_crumb (They're Not Conservative Enough! Get a Rope so We Can Hang Ourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
Emphasis added:

Its Bush's fault!!!

44 posted on 10/14/2005 1:46:42 PM PDT by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eraser2005

It's like conservatives are under a spell. They just can't see this.


45 posted on 10/14/2005 1:46:44 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

$2 trillion. When the Fed budget went over $1 million many were alarmed. What is Fed debt now? We might have to annex China or whatever region is still in the black, if there is one on earth, so we have some help paying this off.


46 posted on 10/14/2005 1:47:18 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
(1) We don't borrow money from China.

You are severely misinformed.

Since 2000, the percentage of U.S. public debt owed to foreigners has doubled. As of July, foreigners held just over $2 trillion, or 44 percent, of federal public debt outstanding. Japan alone now holds more than $680 billion; China, $242 billion; United Kingdom, $160 billion; and Caribbean Banking Centers, $103 billion (U.S. Department of the Treasury).
Source: America’s Foreign Owners

47 posted on 10/14/2005 1:47:50 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Yeah, how dare that nasty Bush spend our tax dollars on a war we didn't start and how dare he do anything to rebuild after Katrina?!?!?!?

There is plenty of pork being flying out of D.C. - and yes, some of that is going into wasteful contracts to Iraq and NO - Iraqis rebuilt Iraq after the first Gulf War, there should be 100% employment of Iraqis now, not contractors getting paid $300K/yr to do the kind of things soldiers did for a small fraction of that pay. Unemployment there only feeds the insurgency.

If we can't get it together under complete Repub rule to get the budget under control and to cut the social welfare state (and yes, I'll include some corporations feasting at the public trough in this) then when is the budget EVER going to get balanced?

48 posted on 10/14/2005 1:48:28 PM PDT by podkane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: cake_crumb
Money borrowed from CHINA?

Yep, see #47.

49 posted on 10/14/2005 1:49:27 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
$319 billion is not the good news. The fact that the deficit is declining is the good news.

Sounds like we need more tax cuts for the "rich"!

50 posted on 10/14/2005 1:50:15 PM PDT by SuperSonic (Don't just complain. Do something productive! >> www.clubforgrowth.org <<)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CGTRWK

Oh. China owns treasury bonds. Apples/organes.


51 posted on 10/14/2005 1:50:37 PM PDT by cake_crumb (They're Not Conservative Enough! Get a Rope so We Can Hang Ourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp; Grampa Dave
It could have dropped 50% and there would still be whiners.

And all this with a war going on, record high energy prices for the last YEAR.

Sheesh, amazes me the bitchin' going on.

52 posted on 10/14/2005 1:51:48 PM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in small groups or in whole armies, we don't care how we do it, but we're gonna getcha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: atlaw
The deficit was still the third-highest on record in dollar terms. Measured against the economy, the gap was equal to 2.6% of gross domestic product, above the 40-year average of 2.3%.

Weeee! Here we go again! How to make a sow's ear out of a silk, er, well, polyester purse!

Before you start, I agree that it's still too damn high!

53 posted on 10/14/2005 1:53:33 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuperSonic
$319 billion is not the good news. The fact that the deficit is declining is the good news.

If it really is declining. If, as Rumsfeld has stated, the past year's $85B for Iraq and Afghanistan is "off-budget", and if the latest $50B is also off budget, my Catholic high school math tells me it's only declining in the "on paper" sense.

Additionally, since the 80's we've been running up surpluses on S.S. taxes (hitting the working and middle classes hardest) which both parties have used to hide the real extent of the deficits, or exaggerate the surpluses. And we are approaching 8 *trillion* in debt...

This is not something to celebrate.

54 posted on 10/14/2005 1:56:54 PM PDT by podkane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp

Tax cuts increase tax revenues. The clueless Democrats will never figure that out.


55 posted on 10/14/2005 2:05:46 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nh1
Yee Haa, Now it's only about $1000 per person.

Ummm, that's just 2005's deficit, to be added to the existing deficit. In other words, we're sinking a little slower.

56 posted on 10/14/2005 2:12:03 PM PDT by TChris ("The central issue is America's credibility and will to prevail" - Goh Chok Tong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
Critics noted that deficits are expected to persist for years to come and that spending related to Hurricane Katrina is likely to drive up red ink significantly in the current fiscal year.

Well, the whining socialist aside, when you have tragic events such as massive hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, etc. raking havoc cannot be predicted and the government will have to respond in kind with money, services, etc. So, those things you cannot plan for or predict. Hell, my weather man has changed our weekend forecast four times since yesterday morning, so how the hell can they predict these huge storms?

57 posted on 10/14/2005 2:13:08 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (All democrats are ENEMIES of the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgribbley; Admin Moderator
"tax cuts" are simply deferred higher taxes (with interest) in the form of debt dumped on future generations without their permission

Did you get lost on your way to Democrat Underground? This is the wrong place to be complaining about tax cuts... Trolling today?

58 posted on 10/14/2005 2:13:40 PM PDT by TChris ("The central issue is America's credibility and will to prevail" - Goh Chok Tong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
Tax reductions work everytime they're tried!!!

True enough. But you only make headway when you reduce spending along with it!

Reagan made it clear enough.

Reading comments on the thread, I get the feeling a lot of people still don't grasp the difference between the deficit and the debt.

Given a federal debt of 8 trillion, shrinking the debt increase (deficit) to 320 billion isn't so great really. You are still going into debt at a rate of about 15% (320 billion deficit in a 2 trillion dollar annual federal budget).

Given that this program is projected by its strongest supporters in the WH to produce large deficits as fas as the eye can see and with the imminent Boomer retirement and Bush's nutty RX socialism plan going into effect, it's hard to see what there is to cheer about when our GOP congress doesn't has the balls to stop spending so much, especially on useless programs or on pure porkbarrel projects.

I'm not sure exactly why we should start dancing in the streets. Just because you refuse to pay your bills (federal debt) and go into debt a little slower than you expected in a single fiscal cycle isn't exactly the small-government revolution conservatives have worked for 'lo these many years.
59 posted on 10/14/2005 2:16:51 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
Just wait until the Katrina and Mediscare Drug Coverage come to roost and it'll drive deeper into the red.

Tax cuts are fabulous but it's long past time for this president to put his words into action and cut spending.

60 posted on 10/14/2005 2:17:04 PM PDT by newzjunkey (CA: Stop union theft for political agendas with YES on Prop 75! Prolife? YES on Prop 73!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-185 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson