To: new yorker 77
Her chances looked good a week ago. Since then there's been a drip-drip-drip of accounts, rumors and stories that don't put her in the best favorable light. And support for her among conservative opinion-makers is decidedly hostile at worst and at best non-commital. Its a not a good sign for a candidate when you can't count on your own base.
(Denny Crane: "I like nature. Don't talk to me about the environment".)
28 posted on
10/14/2005 7:35:46 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
Pundits are not President Bush's base. I can definitely state, with facts to back it up, that Bill Kristol is NOT part of the President's base, and never has been.
The base are the grass-roots GOP (note that phrase...GOP) and pretty much support the President's choice.
Now if you want to make a case that a majority of conservative pundits dislike this choice, that's different.
35 posted on
10/14/2005 7:39:33 AM PDT by
Miss Marple
(Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's son and keep him strong.)
To: goldstategop
53 posted on
10/14/2005 7:56:45 AM PDT by
wardaddy
(Save a cow......eat a vegetarian.)
To: goldstategop
And support for her among conservative opinion-makers...That's the problem. People rely on others to make their opinions for them. The "opinion makers" have told the thundering herd what to think, and like the reliable reactionaries they are, the herd responded as desired.
The reactionary herd and their "opinion makers" are so afraid of Harriet Miers that they even want to deny her hearings where she can exercise her right to speak on her own behalf.
Charming.
150 posted on
10/14/2005 9:04:45 AM PDT by
Wolfstar
("And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm." GWB, 1/20/01)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson