Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gondring
From your link ...
Partly because of the Democrats' success in filibustering appellate court nominees, Bush had a shorter list of candidates to examine for the Supreme Court. Highly qualified prospects were unavailable, deemed too inflammatory by Senate leaders or, as in Estrada's case, unwilling to re-enter the fray.
The President backs down because the Senate deems the contest "too inflammatory." Just a big fat disappointment. Why the hell should I support ANYBODY with this lack of conviction to the Constitution?
517 posted on 10/14/2005 6:24:45 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt; Kryptonite
The President backs down because the Senate deems the contest "too inflammatory." Just a big fat disappointment. Why the hell should I support ANYBODY with this lack of conviction to the Constitution?

Exactly. If he fought it--with conviction, by proposing a candidate who would support our Constitution (leave the issues out of it)--then the American people would see the Left (including the Gang of 7) obstructing the Constitution.

579 posted on 10/14/2005 9:04:41 AM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson