That's interesting, but what does it have to do with what I wrote in that post?
Yes, I should have clarified. In the preservation of marriage and family, it matters not whether the female "has her act together." Such a female is just as disposed to dispensing with life-long marriage as a female who does not "have her act together."
My point is that we men have always faced the choice to defer to the desires and demands of females, or to take control ourselves and set the terms for sexual and social interaction with the opposite sex. We created marriage and family to address precisely that interaction and to advance human civilization and protect the future.
In recent decades we gave up that control to females. In so doing, we got back all the free sex we could ever want, but we gave up marriage and family, gave up our civilization, and gave up the future.
DA740