Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Petition for the Withdrawal of the Nomination of Harriet Miers to the U.S. Supreme Court
NRO ^ | 10/12/05 | David Frum

Posted on 10/12/2005 5:26:46 PM PDT by StatenIsland

WE ARE REPUBLICANS AND CONSERVATIVES who supported the election of George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004. Today, we respectfully urge that the nomination of Harriet Miers to the United States Supreme Court be withdrawn.

The next justice of the Supreme Court should be a person of clear, consistent, and unashamed conservative judicial philosophy.

The next justice should be a person of unquestioned personal and political independence.

The next justice should be someone who has demonstrated a deep engagement in the constitutional issues that regularly come before the Supreme Court — and an appreciation of the originalist perspective on those issues.

The next justice should be a person of the highest standard of intellectual and legal excellence.

For all Harriet Miers. many fine qualities and genuine achievements, we the undersigned believe that she is not that person. An attempt to push her nomination through the Senate will only split the Republican party, damage the Bush presidency, and cast doubts upon the Court itself.

Sometimes Americans elect Republican presidents, sometimes we elect Democratic presidents. Whatever the differences between the parties, surely we can at least agree on this: Each party owes America its best. There is a wide range of truly outstanding legal talents who share the president’s judicial philosophy. We believe that on second thought President Bush can do better — for conservatism, for the Supreme Court, for America.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antibush; auntharriet; crapnomination; deargeorgeandlaura; frum; miers; nro; petition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-307 next last
To: Howlin

"I have a job and it's in the legal profession."

But the important question is whether you are a practitioner.


121 posted on 10/12/2005 6:33:55 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas
This is a battle that has been brewing for a long. It needs to happen.

What are you planning, an overthrow?

122 posted on 10/12/2005 6:34:09 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Cautor

To who?


123 posted on 10/12/2005 6:34:51 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: inquest
hy?! Public petitions are part of how things work in a rePUBLIC. I don't understand this notion that the people shouldn't get too involved in how their servants run their affairs.

I just think, in this case, it is not the most effective tool for communication - and that Frum is not the guy conservatives really want to have carrying the meassage back.

"In your face" does not cause the country club conservatives to compromise with social conservatives, any more that the GOP-power elite gains when its in the face of social conservatives.

The conservative message is persausive. But all ideas need to be "sold," and this is a crappy way to sell the idea. YMMV.

124 posted on 10/12/2005 6:35:57 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Your last several posts are showing you to be desperate for something - anything - to make an argument over. Too bad nothing's stuck to the wall yet.
125 posted on 10/12/2005 6:36:25 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

"To who?"

You means as in "to who is may concern?"


126 posted on 10/12/2005 6:37:09 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

"And they just couldn't say that?"

They should have. They're elitists so I'm not surprised. I may disagree with the wording / approach but full steam ahead on their goal.


127 posted on 10/12/2005 6:37:09 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
"In your face" does not cause the country club conservatives to compromise with social conservatives, any more that the GOP-power elite gains when its in the face of social conservatives.

What else has been known to get their attention?

128 posted on 10/12/2005 6:37:52 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: JFC; Stellar Dendrite; SkyPilot; Betaille; Flux Capacitor; wardaddy
We could be doing great and mighty things.

Greater than nominating someone of Miers' caliber?!

Surely you jest.

129 posted on 10/12/2005 6:38:17 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland
The next justice of the Supreme Court should be a person of clear, consistent, and unashamed conservative judicial philosophy.

unashamed ???

Go to hell Frum

130 posted on 10/12/2005 6:38:37 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

"What are you planning, an overthrow?"

A little coup, now and then, never hurt anyone. [ \ sarcasm ]


131 posted on 10/12/2005 6:39:34 PM PDT by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland
The action and rhetoric from both camps could have dire consequences for the party...

Good. I don't care.

"The Party" stands for nothing except an explosion in spending, bigger government every year, acquiring more power and control and getting reelected.

Screw that; we don't need two Big Stupid Government parties. But that's what we've got.

132 posted on 10/12/2005 6:39:44 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
unashamed ???

Yes, as in, unashamed to take a public stand on something.

133 posted on 10/12/2005 6:40:51 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Has anyone attempted to analyze Harriet's handwriting in post # 48? (Sorry, I haven't read all posts that follow yet.)

This lady (and she's no lady, she's a lawyer!) looks to me (and I only play one on the Internet) as someone with a huge, huge personality and an ego to go along with it. Look at the size of those letters, those curves that intrude on the typed text, this is a person that could run you over, bud, without having to driving a moving vehicle!

134 posted on 10/12/2005 6:41:43 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Except for The Comoros.

:-)

135 posted on 10/12/2005 6:42:25 PM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: StatenIsland

I fart in your general direction!
136 posted on 10/12/2005 6:42:48 PM PDT by TheForceOfOne (It was a village of idiots that raised Hillary to Senator status.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inquest

---So... believing too fervently in a cause might lead to offenses against public order. Got it, I'll be sure to keep that in mind, and not let myself be carried that far. I think I can confidently say the same about my fellow freepers, at least on this issue.---

But you can't just let a constitutional process play out? Free speech and the writing of petitions is in contention here. What I object to is the object of the petition, the removal of a Presidential nominee before going to the Senate. Those opposed to the Miers nomination claim the are opposed out of worry for the Constituion and the Republic. Yet these same people come now wanting to short circuit the process. Many are saying why even have a hearing! Hearings are worthless, but pass me that petitition!


137 posted on 10/12/2005 6:43:05 PM PDT by claudiustg (Go Bush! Go Sharon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
. The Party's lost it's principles and True Conservatives are trying to shove them back in, from one end or the other.

Allowing a person to present her case before being found guilty is against the principles of conservatives??

Since when?

138 posted on 10/12/2005 6:43:15 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jdm

The letter below really nailed it for me. The "You and Laura Are the Greatest!" along the bottom-left margin is a bit too "kissing up" for my style. And underscoring the word "greatest" is too sappy. If you want to communicate that "You and Laura Are the Greatest," put it in the actual letter; don't handwrite such a compliment off to the side.

====

Guess you have not served in government...this is a common practice called personalizing the notes. Often times the note itself is written by staffers.

I would not get upset with this...particularly since Miers knew the then Governor and his wife very well.


139 posted on 10/12/2005 6:44:07 PM PDT by Colonial Warrior ("I've entered the snapdragon part of my life....Part of me has snapped...the rest is draggin'.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

Free speech and the writing of petitions is (not) in contention here.


140 posted on 10/12/2005 6:44:19 PM PDT by claudiustg (Go Bush! Go Sharon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-307 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson