Apparently neither party has the capacity to comprehend the simple term "religious test".
I do not see this as a religious test, I see it as a attempt to sell her to the base, where does it say her qualifications are that she is an Evangelical Christin and therefore is qualified for the SC?
Most of us do comprehend the meaning of the word "part" and almost all the whining is because they fear the nominee is not willing to overturn RvW which is almost a religious test in itself.
This is not a religious test. He chose her because of whatever qualifications the president chose to use to nominate a person. If that included strong religious views, so be it.
If that is why congress approves her, that would be a religious test.
This is not a religious test. He chose her because of whatever qualifications the president chose to use to nominate a person. If that included strong religious views, so be it.
If that is why congress approves her, that would be a religious test.
This is not a religious test. He chose her because of whatever qualifications the president chose to use to nominate a person. If that included strong religious views, so be it.
If that is why congress approves her, that would be a religious test.