Evolution is defined as adaptation to one's environment - whether it "seems" that way to you is neither here nor there. Something makes me doubt that anyone is going to jump at the chance to take responsibility for how things "seem" to you.
Also, all the historically factual evolutionary charts I've been shown have certainly demonstrated increasing complexity.
I think you've omitted the critical half of your post, the half where you demonstrate that "more complex" is the same as "better".
B. bufo - the common European toad - has a genome of 6.9 billion base pairs. Your genome is 2.9 billion base pairs. The toad's genome is self-evidently more complex than yours is. Do you intend to argue that the toad is also, in some respect, "better" than you are?
I think you've omitted the critical half of your post where I based complexity on genome base pairs.
Wait let me rephrase that to make it easier for you:
It seems to me you've omitted the critical half of your post where I based complexity on genome base pairs.