I think you've omitted the critical half of your post where I based complexity on genome base pairs.
Wait let me rephrase that to make it easier for you:
It seems to me you've omitted the critical half of your post where I based complexity on genome base pairs.
You haven't defined "complexity" at all - feel free to jump in at any time and fill that hole. Neverthless, you've pretty clearly taken advantage of a certain equivocation between complexity and goodness, so let's just boil it down to the bare minimum - is the toad's genome "better" than yours? Why or why not?