Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sageb1; RobbyS

So is sexism.

I'm just curious why Mrs. Bush is sharply criticized for charging "sexism", but the brain trust can abandon the President to avoid embarrassment about "cronyism" and nobody says a peep.

They pretty much let the President take this one straight up the ism and are still hiding out in email. Cowards.

I may as well mention how they were planting pro op-ed stories for Roberts, which makes me suspicious now as to whether they are working the reverse angle about Miers.

To say the very least, the President should shun them now for their betrayal, and for airing their dirty laundry with Newsweek.


451 posted on 10/11/2005 10:55:54 PM PDT by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies ]


To: unsycophant

"Cronyism" is just a simple word for doing something for a friend. Sexism, on the other hand, has much farther reaching implications because of the chip-on-the-shoulder that all feminists carry. Plus, there are so many woman who do not understand that someone can be pro-woman and anti-feminist at the same time.


474 posted on 10/11/2005 11:03:18 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies ]

To: unsycophant
The whole thing is becoming ridiculous. There ARE those who obviously were opposed to choosing a woman or a black or a Latino, because 1) they are none of the aforementioned and 2) they are ideologically opposed to anything that smacks of a quota system. The bottom line is, however, that every such choice is a political one. The story is told of Lincoln, who was urged by a friend to get rid of McClellan. Who would I put in his place, Lincoln asked. Why, anyone, his friend said. Lincoln commented sadly, Anyone is good enough for you, but I must have SOMEONE.
719 posted on 10/12/2005 7:41:24 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies ]

To: unsycophant
The whole thing is becoming ridiculous. There ARE those who obviously were opposed to choosing a woman or a black or a Latino, because 1) they are none of the aforementioned and 2) they are ideologically opposed to anything that smacks of a quota system. The bottom line is, however, that every such choice is a political one. The story is told of Lincoln, who was urged by a friend to get rid of McClellan. Who would I put in his place, Lincoln asked. Why, anyone, his friend said. Lincoln commented sadly, Anyone is good enough for you, but I must have SOMEONE.
720 posted on 10/12/2005 7:41:28 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson