Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Informant: Subway Plot No Hoax. Original Source Maintains Threat Was Real
ABC News ^ | 10/11/2005 | ABC News

Posted on 10/11/2005 3:33:48 PM PDT by Pragmatic_View

The original informant who prompted the terror alert on New York City's subways last week is sticking to his story, and there is no basis to conclude the threat was a hoax, sources involved in the investigation of the plot told ABC News.

When last spoken to by interrogators, the original informant has remained firm in his statement that there was in fact a plot.

Citing government sources, several media outlets reported today that information that led to heightened security for the New York City transit system was a hoax.

Those reports said three men arrested in Iraq with suspected links to the possible plot had been interviewed and underwent lie detector tests that showed they knew nothing about such a plan.

But as of earlier today, authorities had not spoken to the original informant since the three captives were interrogated and told authorities there was no plot.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bombthreat; nyc; nycsubway; nycthreat; subwaythreat; terrorism
Well, make of it, what you will.

Looks like more questions, than answers.

1 posted on 10/11/2005 3:33:49 PM PDT by Pragmatic_View
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pragmatic_View

I hate when I stop panicking unnecessarily.


2 posted on 10/11/2005 3:35:24 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pragmatic_View

I didn't think it was a hoax. Unlike certain liberals, I take the Islamic Jihad seriously.


3 posted on 10/11/2005 3:36:43 PM PDT by ladyinred (It is all my fault okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

ROTFL! Too funny!


4 posted on 10/11/2005 3:37:02 PM PDT by ladyinred (It is all my fault okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Pragmatic_View

First it's a hoax. Then it's not a hoax. They're having fun with this.


6 posted on 10/11/2005 3:40:36 PM PDT by Just Lori (Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lizarde

I love Fox, but they oblige when told to kill stories because for national security reasons.


7 posted on 10/11/2005 3:48:04 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Spanaway Lori

Actually, first it was real and specific, but unconfirmed.

Then it was a hoax.

Now it's not a hoax.

It sounds like there were two different sets of government people involved. One group talked with the original informant, but not the other three suspects, and a different group talked to the three suspects, but not the original informant. Then the two sets of government people didn't talk with each other.

Looks like we have a ways to go, before we are coordinated amongst our own government agencies.


8 posted on 10/11/2005 3:48:17 PM PDT by Pragmatic_View
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pragmatic_View

The top people at DHS who are calling it a hoax were the same people who were calling their children living in NYC last week and telling them not to take the subway for the next two weeks. DHS has been charged will killing this story for some reason.


9 posted on 10/11/2005 3:51:13 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Lizarde

And the president of OU is still trying to kill the story. Interesting how there are no longer reports that the Oklahom suicide bomb had a remote control detonator.


11 posted on 10/11/2005 3:55:34 PM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pragmatic_View

Certainly boosting confidence in the security agencies and the politicians.


12 posted on 10/11/2005 3:57:46 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: swarthyguy

Almost reminds one of three stooges running around blindfolded, bumping into each other and poking each others' eyes by mistake. Only not very funny.


14 posted on 10/11/2005 4:09:01 PM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred

I don't doubt that this group intended to blow up or behead somebody. The question is whether it was the New York subways or something more local to Iraq.

In any case, even if this group wasn't planning to visit New York, I'm sure there are others who would like to attack the subways. They are a natural target.


15 posted on 10/11/2005 4:15:03 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pragmatic_View

Saying it's a hoax is a great way for these jokers to save face when their plans are discovered in time to be thwarted.


16 posted on 10/11/2005 4:37:39 PM PDT by wouldntbprudent ("Tell the truth. The Pajama People are watching you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pragmatic_View

'Did not. Did too! Did not! You did too!!' And the department of Homelessness Severity just smiles and porks out.


17 posted on 10/11/2005 5:30:48 PM PDT by dhuffman@awod.com (The conspiracy of ignorance masquerades as common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson