[rkhampton]

Good science is testable. Macroevolution is not.

What is your definition of testable. I think what you are saying is that macroeveolution is not instantaneously testable, like the laws of physics, or even testable within you lifetime. This is not the same thing as "testable."

[jsmith48]

What are the practical limits of being testable? By placing a hypothesis on a virtually infinite time scale, you can make- and get away with- all kinds of wild guesses.

Just because you can theoretically test something doesn't mean that you can actually do it.

Change the Scientific Method, and I'll change my opinion.