Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: indcons

You think it's confusing, huh? Why?


134 posted on 10/11/2005 7:19:08 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: Alia

It's not confusing to me, but it is quite silly. If you think that charges of sexism from Laura Bush are gonna keep Dems from opposing Miers, then you're delusional.


143 posted on 10/11/2005 7:22:09 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

To: Alia

In fact, I'd bet at least one Dem will explain his/her vote against confirmation something like this: "Although sexism might play a part in why some of my 'friends' across the aisle object to Ms. Miers, my own concerns are [blah, blah, blah, blah]. Therefore, I cannot in good conscience vote to confirm a nominee who might roll back [blah, blah, blah], take us back to [blah, blah, blah], and erode the civil liberties that [blah, blah, blah, blah]."


157 posted on 10/11/2005 7:26:51 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

To: Alia

How do you support your statement that Laura Bush is checkmating the Dims? Accusing her own base of sexism even before the Dims do it is contempt.


208 posted on 10/11/2005 8:15:39 AM PDT by indcons (Let the Arabs take care of their jihadi brothers this time around (re: Paki earthquake))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson