Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alia

In fact, I'd bet at least one Dem will explain his/her vote against confirmation something like this: "Although sexism might play a part in why some of my 'friends' across the aisle object to Ms. Miers, my own concerns are [blah, blah, blah, blah]. Therefore, I cannot in good conscience vote to confirm a nominee who might roll back [blah, blah, blah], take us back to [blah, blah, blah], and erode the civil liberties that [blah, blah, blah, blah]."


157 posted on 10/11/2005 7:26:51 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: AntiGuv
Yes, that could indeed happen.

And should it, it'll kinda put a dent into the Dem's usual, and future, "promote" women as a sex kind of stuff. Their "for character" while slamming "sexism in the Repub Wing", could backfire in future "staging events". Time will tell. If they do this, it could be hell on their "female" quota usual platform.

181 posted on 10/11/2005 7:40:25 AM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson