Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Laura Bush says sexism possible in Miers criticism
Reuters ^ | Tue Oct 11, 2005 8:46 AM ET | By Tabassum Zakaria

Posted on 10/11/2005 6:14:59 AM PDT by Sometimes A River

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-410 next last
To: GarySpFc

Note: Marshall "spoke forcefully on behalf of the new constitution".

Has Meiers spoken forcefully on behalf of any cause?


41 posted on 10/11/2005 6:37:23 AM PDT by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

"She is a role model for young women around our country" - yeah, become a political hack to get somwhere.


42 posted on 10/11/2005 6:38:20 AM PDT by Panerai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
No offense but please quit SPAMMING every thread with this nonsense. This isn't 1800 and 'Harry' Miers ain't John Marshall.

BTW just curious, what was you're MOS? You're home page doesn't mention it.

43 posted on 10/11/2005 6:39:00 AM PDT by Condor51 (Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites - Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38
"That's possible, I think that's possible," Mrs. Bush said when asked on NBC's "Today Show" whether criticism that Miers lacked intellectual heft were sexist in nature. She said Miers' accomplishments as a lawyer were a role model to young women.

Laura, you are a disappointment.

First, it is now painfully obvious that although your husband is a genius, he had a political brain fart last week.

Now it appears that whatever affected him has now affected you as well. Keep it up, you will lose even more of your supporters.

Oh, and lay off the liberal refried beans, they make you temporarily stupid.
44 posted on 10/11/2005 6:39:14 AM PDT by safisoft (Give me Torah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38
Taking issue with her commetns is now "trashing?" Thank you for proving my point.

You mean you don't blindly trust Bush, who seems to be blindly trusting Harriet Miers? What kind of Bush-hating, sexist elitist Christian-hating commie are you? Go back to DU.

Just saving someone some time posting these intelligent aguements which will certainly follow....

45 posted on 10/11/2005 6:39:24 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38
"Laura Bush says sexism possible in Miers criticism"

Hey, folks! Before we all drink the Kool-Aid being prepared by the liberals, let's understand what was actually said here. I think is some cases, it could very well be that sexism is a reason for criticizing Harriet Miers' nomination.

On the other hand, maybe some of us just want some information first, before we decide whether we support her or not.

46 posted on 10/11/2005 6:39:26 AM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38
Laaura might just have well said, "Its a vast right wing Conservative agenda"...
47 posted on 10/11/2005 6:40:15 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38

This charge is silly. And I say that as someone who has been arguing on the side of Miers for days now. The fact is, most of Miers' conservative critics would love to see Priscilla Owen.

C'mon, Laura. Get with the program.


48 posted on 10/11/2005 6:40:21 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris1
So now Meirs is like John Marshall?

Or like Souter?? And that's the rub, we don't know?

GW's choice here may be one of his wisest decisions, but then again, it could be one of his worst!

49 posted on 10/11/2005 6:40:59 AM PDT by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

The implication is pretty clear.

She's talking like a politician.

If she didn't mean to make the charge, she wouldn't have brought up the possibility.

Would someone have reason to be offended if I said "It's possible that he beats his wife?"


50 posted on 10/11/2005 6:42:21 AM PDT by Sometimes A River (Serving on a Meals-on-Wheels program is NOT a qualification for a SC nominee. Call your Senators!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38

Sloth Says Stupidity Possible in Laura Bush Comments


51 posted on 10/11/2005 6:42:27 AM PDT by Sloth (We cannot defeat foreign enemies of the Constitution if we yield to the domestic ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38
I can't believe the WH is treating conservatives who have real and legitimate questions concerning his nominee in this manner. I worked hard for this President in two elections, and now they are slinging mud at anyone who questions them from the right. How depressing!
52 posted on 10/11/2005 6:42:58 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38

Sexism, what a pants load. Conservatives wanted the choice to be from A-list judges -- Sam Alito, Janice Rogers Brown, Priscilla Owen, Michael Luttig, and Michael McConnell, to name a few.

That list has almost 50% women and all have better credentials than Ms Miers.


53 posted on 10/11/2005 6:43:09 AM PDT by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

Stunning, isn't it?


54 posted on 10/11/2005 6:43:33 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
No, it's not. It's about whether Miers will rule as an originalist, not a conservative. Yes, there is a difference between the two: a conservative would jump at the first chance a case presented to ban abortion, while an originalist would refer said issue to the states.

I disagree. Most conservatives view it as a states rights issue first, but would work to restrict abortions at the state level.

55 posted on 10/11/2005 6:43:54 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Owen
Campaign Finance Reform, Prescription Drug Benefit, border security, endorsing RINOs like Riordan and Specter, bad-mouthing the SwiftVets, etc...

Yeah, I'm boggled

56 posted on 10/11/2005 6:44:05 AM PDT by BufordP (Excluding the WOT, I haven't trusted W since he coined the term "compassionate conservative")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
"Laura Bush says sexism possible in Miers criticism" Hey, folks! Before we all drink the Kool-Aid being prepared by the liberals, let's understand what was actually said here.

Wake up. It is NOT EVEN POSSIBLE that it is about sexism. Sheesh. Some 'conservatives' are turning to mush brains over this.
57 posted on 10/11/2005 6:44:09 AM PDT by safisoft (Give me Torah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: BufordP

Beyond anything I've seen.


58 posted on 10/11/2005 6:44:13 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38

Then I suppose racism is possible in Bush's failure to nominate Janice Rogers Brown?


59 posted on 10/11/2005 6:45:21 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Do you think her (Miers) opponents are sexist?


60 posted on 10/11/2005 6:45:27 AM PDT by Sometimes A River (Serving on a Meals-on-Wheels program is NOT a qualification for a SC nominee. Call your Senators!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-410 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson