[Ol' Sparky]

LOL...How in the world do we know what Miers judicial philosophy is? I'm not even sure she knows.

The only thing we have is Bush's word on it, just like we had Reagan's word that Souter and Kennedy were conservative and just like we had Bush 41's word Souter was.

Blindly trusting Republican Presidents and playing Russian roulette with these nominations is STUPID. It's no wonder that things never change on the Supreme Court.

Compare that to the Clinton strategy of finding justices with proven track records and nominating. Worked every time it was tried for Slick Willie. As much as I may dislike Clinton, he and his followers are infinitely smarter than a good number of conservatives.

[goodnesswins]

"As much as I may dislike Clinton, he and his followers are infinitely smarter than a good number of conservatives."

YEAH, and Clinton had the MSM on HIS SIDE. Think about that.

[teawithmisswilliams]

LOL...How in the world do we know what Miers judicial philosophy is? I'm not even sure she knows.

Well, according to PoliPundit she's apparently fine with so-called affirmative action:

Miers is a documented supporter of “diversity,” a codeword for racial discrimination. She seems to have helped create the White House’s split-the-baby position on this issue in the University of Michigan cases in 2003, that helped keep affirmative action legal.

Looks like Sandra Day O'Connor is indeed being replaced.

[bray]

Bottom line, you don't trust Bush and we do. We didn't vote for you or your opinion so it makes no matter what you think. Your chrystal ball is no better than ours. Perhaps you'll give her the benefit of the doubt in the hearings or are you looking for a pound of flesh?

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters