To: eleni121
If Bill Clinton appointed a personal White House aide to be a Supreme Court justice, we'd be against it. I am against cronyism regardless of party. There are more qualified individuals to serve on our nation's highest court.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".) 20 posted on
10/09/2005 10:33:59 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
Bill Clinton could appoint a dogcatcher and I'd root for the dogs.
Dubya has my confidence and I have admired most if not all his appointments.
24 posted on
10/09/2005 10:36:19 PM PDT by
eleni121
('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
To: goldstategop
Speak for yourself. I might harumph at such a nomination by Bill Clinton, but I would not dismiss the person based on his/her association with Bill Clinton. I would at least wait for Senate hearings before determining whether or not the person is qualified.
To: goldstategop
If Bill Clinton appointed a personal White House aide to be a Supreme Court justice, we'd be against it. Hogwash. We'd be against any Clinton appointee simply because it was a Clinton appointee. As to the specific person nominated, that's one of the perks of winning the freaking election.
170 posted on
10/10/2005 6:44:05 AM PDT by
kevkrom
("Political looters" should be on sight)
To: goldstategop
Please define "qualified", with appropriate constitutional references.
202 posted on
10/10/2005 8:38:08 AM PDT by
MortMan
(Eschew Obfuscation)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson