Posted on 10/09/2005 9:50:34 PM PDT by msnimje
Well, I have offered you evidence, circumstantial evidence. What would constitute "proof" for you? His own admission? Give him time, he lacks the conviction and self-admiration of Barney Frank.
Not every life-long bachelor is gay. There are many unmarried people...think of Condi Rice for one. Too busy, no one meets standards, more intellectual than social, etc. We all choose a unique path so why judge someone by marital status?
No, you're not that kind of guy. But you are the kind of guy who accuses someone of being gay without adequate proof. Not that there's anything wrong with that.
Exactly- there is a standing joke between me & my brother in law-
"Where's my 200 head of prime beef cattle?"
He was so worried his "little Sis" would never get married that he rashly swore, in public, that the first man to marry his sister would get 200 head of cattle. And his undying loyalty. And I've never let him forget it.
After 21 years, I also kind of doubt I'm going to take delivery on the herd, either.
Like many people, she had a career that took precedence over marriage when she was young- and like a lot of single, public figures ( yes, in our little bailiwick, she was somewhat famous ), there were rumors and hints and mutterings that she was gay, too-- although by my reckoning, she's about a hetro as any woman I've ever known.
As far as this story goes? Who knows? It's kind of charming- but I really don't think it's anyone else's business.
I have absolutely no problem with a gay man or lesbian sitting on the Supreme Court-provided that they meet other criteria-but I certainly do have objections-very strong ones, in fact-to nominating an individual who could possibly be exposed to a public "outing," or subjected to black mail in order to prevent one.
Ah, now there's an excellent point.
We have no reason to believe she's gay, but on the remote chance that she is, and is concealing her sexual orientation in order to prevent an outcry among evangelicals-or for whatever reason-then we're in some deep sh*t.
I don't think she's gay either.
In general though, people commonly forget the risk of blackmail when dealing with that question.
The only point I'm trying to make is that the most far-fetched scenarios are not so unrealistic when you are dealing with a complete enigma.
Agreed.
Don't know if Souter is gay, but apparently not all "confirmed bachelors" are. Brian Lamb of C-SPAN just got married for the first time about 2 weeks ago. He is 64.
There is no proof that Souter is gay. You are correct. There is some circumstantial evidence. Now, normally, it would not be polite to accuse someone of being gay for that.
Personally, however, I have always felt that there are a small number of people who are so detestable, that is it OK to accuse them of such because:
1. They deserve it.
2. It makes me feel better to know that it is still possible to "accuse" someone of being gay.
I guess he would fall into the "secret beliefs" category though.
Also, I will add that there is a cultural responsibility to accuse certain people of being gay whether or not they really are.
For example, every time Richard Gere's name comes up, it is important to bring up Gerbils, even though we all know that story is "false" from a truth standpoint, yet it is "true" from a cultural standpoint.
It is opportunities like this that allow conservatives to dip our toes into the idiotic "truth is relative" world that liberals live in. Remember, know thy enemy. In this case, we do it at the expense of Richard Gere, and perhaps Souter (although I think he probobaly is gay).
...but also the assertion from her detractors that she's a devout Christian.
Oops, I meant "supporters".
How do you figure that?
My, you people (anti-Miers crowd) have active imaginations.
Um, isn't it fairly obvious? Decades-long "European" relationships aren't exactly consistent with the teachings of what's-his-name... that Jesus fellow. Unless you are claiming that their decades-long relationship, which was "at times romantic", was strictly platonic?
I'm claiming that:
1. Neither you nor I know the private details of the lady's love life;
2. It's none of our damn business.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.