Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
"This is why nominating someone with a public record is preferable to nominating an admitted blank slate, stealth candidate."

Exactly.

Liberals openly nominate their candidates. We should do the same. Otherwise, we set a horrible precedent and punish those Conservatives who openly made tough decisions issuing rulings based on original intent, or standing up for conservative principles.

198 posted on 10/09/2005 11:34:38 AM PDT by TAdams8591 (A Reagan Conservative and mighty proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]


To: TAdams8591
Yes, we should. But there are several, sometimes conflicting, criteria to choosing a Supreme Court nominee. This criteria is not the only one.

The number one criteria in my book is that their voting record, once on the Court, much more closely matches that of Scalia and Thomas than it does that of Ginsberg or Stevens.

I will compromise on everything else, if I get that. If I don't get that, then nothing else will be an adequate substitute.

214 posted on 10/09/2005 11:44:27 AM PDT by ThePythonicCow (To err is human; to moo is bovine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson