Skip to comments.
Antonin Scalia Defends Miers
Newsmax ^
| 10/9/5
Posted on 10/09/2005 9:10:09 AM PDT by Crackingham
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 521-532 next last
To: ilovew
"in which case your entire argument would be completely irrelevant "
This is what I love about members of the George Bush personality cult, when presented with a lucid argument yall never disappoint me, bots always hurl insults! LOL, yall are you own worst enemies, you can't discuss, can't debate, all you can to is insult. LOL, how I love posting to kool-aid drinkers, it's like shooting fish in a barrel.
341
posted on
10/09/2005 12:32:21 PM PDT
by
jpsb
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Why bother voting for him if you believe he would pick a Supreme Court justice out of spite? Your argument is irrational and hysterical.
342
posted on
10/09/2005 12:33:00 PM PDT
by
ilovew
(Never insult my role model. I LOVE KARL ROVE!)
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
And you Bush-Haters believe that he would rip her to shreds like you have been, if only he could. I've been around long enough to remember the Clintonistas using the term "Clinton haters" to try to squelch criticism of Clintigula. How nice that you're taking a page from their hymnal.
343
posted on
10/09/2005 12:33:54 PM PDT
by
Map Kernow
("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
To: Sabramerican
I heard Mark Levin on a radio show saying that most of the justices do go in for the DC social scene, and this most probably accounts for the drift leftward of O'Connor and Kennedy. He said that Scalia and Thomas don't.
I heard on Fox that in her years in DC, Miers has never gotten into that scene; I forget who was reporting, but he said that might be part of the reason Bush trusts her not to change.
Conceivably there may be duty things that they'd all have to go, but such an event would probably be large and the social obligation be only to put in an appearance. Though not being part of DC social scene myself, I can't speak authoritatively. ;-)
344
posted on
10/09/2005 12:33:56 PM PDT
by
maryz
To: Map Kernow
I never said you should assume she's on your side. Did I say I knew Miers was a conservative? Nope.
345
posted on
10/09/2005 12:34:52 PM PDT
by
ilovew
(Never insult my role model. I LOVE KARL ROVE!)
To: ilovew
"If you truly believe that President Bush would nominate someone out of spite..."
Not spite; cronyism.
"as there is nothing he could ever do that would make you happy."
Nominating Janice Rogers Brown or Priscilla Owen would make me very happy.
346
posted on
10/09/2005 12:34:52 PM PDT
by
jdm
To: Brilliant
Golly---you know SO MUCH more than our President who has worked with Harriet on a personal level for more than ten years...gee whiz...you are just amazing...you KNOW that Harriet is not qualified, event though this attorney was the lead person in the WH for the vetting and nomination of all of the judges President Bush has nominated, INCLUDING Judge Roberts.
Gee....she must know NOTHING about what our PResident wants from a judge he nominates....nothing at all...just WISH our President had consulted with YOU!
347
posted on
10/09/2005 12:35:03 PM PDT
by
Republic
(Michael Schiavo LIED about having a college degree on his guardianship application,)
To: Map Kernow
oh and bushbot is a term of endearment? LOL!
348
posted on
10/09/2005 12:35:10 PM PDT
by
xsmommy
To: jpsb
You obviously don't know anything about me because anyone who does knows that I DON'T agree with President Bush on everything. And as far hurling insults, did you even think about your own post? It said absolutely nothing constructive.
349
posted on
10/09/2005 12:37:08 PM PDT
by
ilovew
(Never insult my role model. I LOVE KARL ROVE!)
To: af_vet_1981
David Souter, another stealth candidate, was brought to us by the "trust me" GOP, mainly Bush the elders chief of Staff and the very respected GOP senator from N.H. Souther makes the case for a nominating a well known conservative, thanks for bringing it up.
350
posted on
10/09/2005 12:37:32 PM PDT
by
jpsb
To: Stellar Dendrite
Well, we know Harriet Miers thinks Bush is a genius-- David Frum said she goes around saying he's the most brilliant man she ever metLOL...If that's the qualification, there're any number of FReepers currently qualified to sit on the Supreme Court!!!! ;)
351
posted on
10/09/2005 12:37:50 PM PDT
by
Map Kernow
("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
To: ilovew
No, I didn't believe that when I voted him.
In fact, I voted for him specifically for this purpose, i.e. to reshape the courts with a restrained, originalist intent.
You might say that I TRUSTED him.
Thank goodness I'll never make that mistake again.
352
posted on
10/09/2005 12:38:24 PM PDT
by
Do not dub me shapka broham
("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
To: jdm
The spite remark was not directed towards you so there is really no point in you refuting it.
353
posted on
10/09/2005 12:38:55 PM PDT
by
ilovew
(Never insult my role model. I LOVE KARL ROVE!)
To: jpsb
No comparison whatsoever. POTUS knows Harriet Miers, personally and professionally.
That Souter stuff don't hunt.
354
posted on
10/09/2005 12:39:03 PM PDT
by
onyx
((Vicksburg, MS) North is a direction. South is a way of life.)
To: ilovew
Did I say I knew Miers was a conservative? Nope.Do you want to know?
355
posted on
10/09/2005 12:39:05 PM PDT
by
Map Kernow
("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
To: jdm
If the label doesn't apply to you, then please don't take it personally. I'm just tired of people who generally support the President being called names all the time.
356
posted on
10/09/2005 12:39:38 PM PDT
by
DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
(I have an FR stalker, folks. He's already driven one woman off of FR...going for two, I guess.)
To: ilovew
Let me guess your handle is I.LOVE.W but you are not a kool-aid drinking, personality cult bushbot, right? LOL, yall really crack me up. LOL.
357
posted on
10/09/2005 12:40:07 PM PDT
by
jpsb
To: Republic
"Golly---you know SO MUCH more than our President who has worked with Harriet on a personal level for more than ten years...gee whiz...you are just amazing...you KNOW that Harriet is not qualified, event though this attorney was the lead person in the WH for the vetting and nomination of all of the judges President Bush has nominated, INCLUDING Judge Roberts. Gee....she must know NOTHING about what our PResident wants from a judge he nominates....nothing at all...just WISH our President had consulted with YOU!"
Yeah, it's the side against the Harriet Miers nomination that's hysterical. [ \ sarcasm ]
358
posted on
10/09/2005 12:40:55 PM PDT
by
jdm
To: Do not dub me shapka broham
Yes, certainly. You wouldn't want to make the mistake of trusting a man you trusted when you voted for him.
359
posted on
10/09/2005 12:41:08 PM PDT
by
ilovew
(Never insult my role model. I LOVE KARL ROVE!)
To: xsmommy
oh and bushbot is a term of endearment? LOL!I know I shouldn't talk back, mommy, but...
some FReepers call themselves "bushbot" here---more'n one---and they seem to like themselves an awful lot, mommy...honest, mommy... ;)
360
posted on
10/09/2005 12:41:10 PM PDT
by
Map Kernow
("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 521-532 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson