That's for sure. It really irks me that Freepers who haven't been on these threads hardly at all, and who haven't bothered to read all the stuff and find out all the facts, just pop in from time to time to tell us "Nothing here, move along" when they don't have a clue because they haven't been following the situation. What nerve!
They say we are jumping to conclusions based on nothing but rumors, and then ask to see evidence -- but they don't bother to read all the OU Bombing threads. I know they haven't read them, because if they had, they wouldn't be asking for proof and talking about rumors. The facts are all there, in reports from local television in OK. Freepers such as LibertyRocks have devoted a great deal of time and effort into collecting all the reported facts and assembling them into concise notes that the skeptics could very easily read and understand. But apparently, these facts are meaningless to the skeptics because they're not being reported in the MSM. The fact they put creedence only in something if it's reported in the MSM speaks volumes.
I also find it interesting that it seems the skeptics only show up on an OU Bombing thread when that thread is based on an article which is obvious spin. They seem to come over to reinforce that spin.
I have noticed exactly the same thing and it is irritating. Some of us might be the last people standing but I refuse to take what the MSM has to say as fact. I can still think for myself and I am not willing to take everything fed to the media as fact when two and two do not add up. We are smarter then that and I am surprised at the some of the people who are not. But then we have the types on here that run to post from the NY Times when it suits their agenda. Wonder what the agenda is of some folks on here?