Posted on 10/08/2005 12:09:57 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob
Armed with that information, I posted this on Newsbusters.org minutes ago.
Enjoy, as much as you can enjoy any article about Hillary that does not include a reference to her entry into Camp Cupcake (Martha Stewart's recent "alma mater").
John / Billybob
Amen
"The papers on Peter Paul’s civil suit against Hillary Clinton and others was served on both her and Rosen, before that final report was filed, under oath, with the FEC. The papers included receipts and copies of checks to prove the real cost of the Clinton Gala, as found as a fact by the FEC."
Looks like this would nail the Clinton campaign, unless they can successfully claim that the expense report wasn't accurate or that somehow the campaign was not responsible for those expenses - maybe by claiming Paul wasn't authorized to spend that money (or that much money)on behalf of the campaign.
This should be interesting. Have you sent it to Drudge?
witt didn't miss the story. She simply chose not to report it.
Just another example of a clintoonian crony getting away with "murder".
Why not post a list of NEWS Reporters that covered Hillary in all campaigns.
The reporters are only allowed CERTAIN QUESTIONS to ask.
Hillary does not answer any question she does not PRE-APPROVE and the who the reporter is.
What a Slime Bag !
I understand.
Any idea what the Clinton response is going to be now that the dates show they had the lawsuit before the report was filed?
Do they admit Paul was authorized to spend this much on their behalf?
What I want to see printed is her Thesis! The MSM love the Skanks.
If you will read my (peter paul) two emails written to Witt after interviewing me for 12 hours, you will see how I pleaded for her to respect her obligation as a member of the Fourth estate to include the basic facts about the Clinton personal involvement, no matter the heavens might fall.
She ignored my pleading and brazenly wrote a whitewash. see links to www.hillcap.org
In kind cash contributions are required to be reported by a federal campaign committee notwithstanding who made them and whether they are "approved". Its the responsibility of the committee to police contributions. In this case, Hillary's finance director literally worked in my offices and witnessed and enabled all my payments on Hillary's behalf. There has never been a question of "authorizing" my contributions, only of reporting the ones I made, legally.
I have no doubt Witt knows the truth and knew it when she put togethere this whitewash.
Its true that in america some are a little more equal than others.. others are a lot more equal.. and yet others seem to beyond the law..
Who is going to wield the hammer?
Kinda' slaps the face of the Constitution doesn't it?
Nothing is going to interfere with their agenda.
It will be great sport for the next year watching the press fall all over themselves promoting Hillary's candidacy and attempting to torpedo anything that looks like a threat.
The entertainment value comes from knowing that, by her own actions, she has already destroyed her chances for becoming a candidate and that it will be her own party who has to take her down.
In the entertainment world this is called "slapstick."
And his loved ones are still alive....
Yes, it's tough -- but what else could we expect from the house organ of the Democratic Party?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.